Did @[email protected] or @[email protected] put together a draft FEP that successfully merges 7888, 400e, and @[email protected]’s conversation containers? I remember reading it last week, and wonder if it’s the one true FEP that will render the others obsolete.
That wasn’t in my original doco and I’m not using it currently. I’ll need to see what problem is solved by having Context before I offer an opinion.
I recall @[email protected] took issue with the fact that ‘context’ and ‘target’ are the same object and he felt this was duplicitous. There’s also a bit of an issue that a “partial object” (defined in FEP-400e) isn’t really defined anywhere in the base specs either - and perhaps using Context will help resolve that.
Since it’s a SHOULD, my original implementation is arguably compliant with the FEP without it.
@mikedev @trwnh @julian
Context
helps with identifying thetarget
. When I receive anAdd
activity, I need to know what collection is being modified. Is it afeatured
collection, acontext
, or something else?One solution is to keep an index of all known collections and search through it every time Add is received.
Another solution would require cooperation from producers, but I think it is a bit cleaner: embed partial representation of a
target
and use specific type there, likeContext
, instead ofCollection
. Then, as a consumer, I can simply checktarget.type
instead of searching fortarget.id
in my collection index.@trwnh @mikedev @julian This object design pattern (partial embeddings) can be used in other situations too. We can use a new property like
partial: true
do indicate partial representations:https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/partially-embedded-objects/4450