Alan Miller shook and trembled on gurney after becoming second person to be executed by controversial technique

Alabama has carried out the second execution in the US using the controversial method of nitrogen gas, an experimental technique for humans that veterinarians have deemed unacceptable in the US and Europe for the euthanasia of most animals.

Alan Eugene Miller, 59, was pronounced dead on Thursday evening at a south Alabama prison. The lethal method involves being strapped to a gurney, where a respirator mask is applied to the face and pure nitrogen piped in. The resulting oxygen deprivation will cause death by asphyxia.

Miller shook and trembled on the gurney for about two minutes with his body at times pulling against the restraints, followed by about six minutes of gasping breathing, according to the Associated Press.

Miller’s death is the latest in an extraordinary week in the US in which five condemned men in five states are set to be killed over six days. Three prisoners have already been executed – on Friday South Carolina killed Khalil Divine Black Sun Allah in its first execution in 13 years, then on Tuesday Texas killed Travis Mullis and Missouri put to death Marcellus Williams.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Agreed, but firing squad seems to be the closest to humane.

    The executed died quickly, and the executors don’t know for certain that they had a bullet.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think they found extreme PTSD in the executioners that used that method.

      You don’t know if you killed them or not, a lot of times. That will gnaw at people who aren’t okay with killing, especially in such a cold and sterile way.

      Plus, it isn’t always quick.

      • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As someone who has fired a ton of live rounds as well as a ton of blanks, I don’t understand how anyone can’t tell whether they fired one or the other.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would say guillotine would be closest. Even an entire squad shooting at you could potentially miss your heart.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Due to blood being produced I believe that’s disqualified. Otherwise a .22 caliber bullet followed instantly by a .22 hollow point to both the brain and the heart simultaneously would be the fastest and most humane experience for the victim.

        However, very few people want to build and operate such a contraption.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            the best answer I can find is that the Olympic committee protested that it would affect whether the Olympics would accept attendance in that city if they allowed it, maybe someone can do a deeper dive.

            Of why it’s coming back - a) Trump repopularized execution, b) Pfizer caved to public pressure to stop producing lethal injection drugs and c) electric chairs aren’t humane and suffer the same issue as firing squad that executioners suffer PTSD, it’s not very humane - being painful, long and often taking multiple attempts until the victim has a heart attack, which they of course experience and then die.

            It seems like the answer I can get is that nobody really likes killing people, those that do suffer PTSD, and the messier the method the more unpopular it is.

            Probably, with a bit of reflection, many people don’t actually like the death penalty when it comes to being present at it.