SpaceX projected 20 million Starlink users by 2022—it ended up with 1 million::Starlink has a fraction of the projected $12B revenue and 20M users, WSJ says.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Starlink is perfect for nationalization. Internet is. Infact, nationalize all utilities. Yes, internet should be a utility at this point. It should not be run for profit.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      After Musk disabled Starlink to aid Russia, a hostile state in their efforts to invade a sovereign democracy, it should have been clear to everyone that Musk poses a very real security threat, and Starlink should have been seized and nationalised.

      • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This fiasco is a glaring example that no one indvidual shold be able to accrue enough wealth to affect entire countries.

        • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Complete with another unsuccessful Business Plot. But this time, some of the ringleaders may be punished.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Y’all all really think there isn’t something more going on there? Like people being like “Crimea is Ukraine!” Well yes I agree with the sentiment, even the US government doesn’t consider crimea to be Ukraine

        Edit: After looking further I do see the US stance is that Crimea is Ukraine, however they have specifically not been providing weaponry with the intent of retaking Crimea (at least until recently where it seems they’ve taken a looser stance on it) similarly to how they weren’t providing weaponry to attack Russia, the whole idea was that we were helping them defend themselves “only”.

    • mailerdaemon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone who lives in a country that formerly had a nationalized phone company in the internet age, and currently has a nationalized power company and airline. Dear God fuck no!

      • CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my country, the main backbone is built, owned and operated by the government. The services on it are privatized

      • demlet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I say we let him build up a huge satellite fleet and then force him to sell a huge chunk of it under antitrust law.

        • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          You mean the same government that allowed XM and Sirius to merge with no other satellite radio competition would go after Starlink when they have competition (Hughesnet)?