• RattlerSix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If my math is correct and we taxed everything over 100 billion at 100% we’d get over 900 billion in taxes. Nearly a trillion bucks if we limited these assholes to a measly 100 billion.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      A trillion bucks, but not in cash; in shares of those companies. Try to sell it all for cash and you tank the share price. People lose their jobs, pension funds that own shares in those companies lose value.

      That’s the trouble with taxing wealth. It’s not liquid like income. All that net worth is tied up in the companies and not easily accessed.

      • ebc@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d be okay with the govt owning shares, honestly. That way the public would get a voice in how these megacorps operate, and that voice would get bigger the larger the company becomes.

        • deafboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          govt owning shares, honestly. That way the public would get a voice

          How would a public get a voice? The government would have a voice.

          • ebc@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            In theory, the government is elected by the public. Not a given these days, I know.