- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
TL;DR think about your opsec before going full paranoid.
Opsec is my second favourite word
Thats the idea. make everything difficult unless you do it the way they want. Have to call my insurance today to find my account number for sending a payment through billpay as they are basically hiding it because it necessary to pay outside of putting something on their system. don’t want you paying from your system (bank) must put in your card in theirs.
at this point, individual effort wont cut it beyond making people feel better. a big collective push for laws, open software, reform or whathaveyou is what it would take to move the needle.
Tries soloing everything, then cries they’re tired…
Tech bros can’t think beyond themselves. When will they say work together, make a group, make your own little groups.
Start with stuff that affects others, like escaping Discord (or only keeping it to help more escape).
One of my dreams is the internet becoming peer2peer, cutting out the big players.
The internet is peer-to-peer.
Yes…
Google Data Center is a peer and so is an online shitposter!
The internet is supposed to be peer-to-peer
FTFY. Megalomaniacal corporations, especially advertisers and the copyright cartel, are Hell-bent on “fixing” that so they can better control and exploit everyone, though.
I don’t know about you, but I’m not a datacenter or server farm. (Yet?)
Decentralization is the only way to fight corruption which is essentially the result of centralization.
But this requires adult people to have personal responsibility to improve their lives and then having solidarity for other like minded people AND the under class.
I’ve seen this dude’s videos before, it’s always the same. Whine about how hard privacy is in a monotone voice.
He’s not wrong, but goddamn is it monotonous content.
I tried to go hard on privacy, but the more you know the more you realize how difficult it is.
So, the best thing to do if figure out who you don’t want to see your info. If it’s the government then you are basically out of luck in my opinion.
I stopped stressing about it when I decided to not let my need for privacy to interfere with my work.
In my personal life, things are more private luckily.
Fun story, my neighbor locked himself out of his house last night and knocked on my door to borrow a cell phone to call his wife. I trotted over with a Costco card, slipped it in the door, and had it open with 30 seconds of jiggling.
Sometimes people need to chill and learn to prioritize their security efforts. There are compromises to be made, lines to draw and accept that sometimes where they are is “good enough”. No sense self-hosting stuff, losing contact with friends and family because they won’t install fb anywhere, while they leave windows and sliding doors open to the house.
In Italy we have a weird culture of “porta blindata” as main house door.
Basically evry house has it. I’m not saying is super secure but at least you would need some lockpicking skills to open it, it’s not something you can knock down with 1 shot like you see in the movies
Somewhat disagreed: the lack (or lousiness) of physical security doesn’t somehow magically make self-hosting work worse. Given I live in the middle of nowhere in an average house for the area, I can pretty much live the doors unlocked when I go out. Alternatively, if I live in some fancy neighborhood in a fancy house, I likely need some security system.
As for self-hosting, it’s more convenient in the long term, I think. “We change our terms of service, and now require the soul of your firstborn” – idgaf; “unavailable due to legal reasons” (tnx, tailscale, much appreciated you giving 0 notice, not that I’m salty about it or anything) – idgaf; internet outage – idgaf; and so on. Well, you may need to invest into duplicating critical infrastructure like password managers or the VPN host, but that’s a relatively small price to pay, IMO.
And for loosing the contact, a couple of those I care about agreed to move the communication to matrix… So, it feels like friends who don’t consider talking to you on platforms other than snoopbook despite them requiring little to no PII (signal is a bit of an exception here, but that have a relatively good track record) aren’t too much interested in talking to you as a whole. And, well, should you be interested in talking to them in return? Although, I’m admittedly quite comfortable alone, and more extraverted (or less schizoid) folks may still feel uncomfortable with that course of action.
He needs to have a Monero donation address
hey E., tell Sloane I said “What up”
2:10 “I assumed that, if I couldn’t beat the system, there was no point on whatever I was doing”: that’s the old nirvana fallacy. The rest of the video is about dismantling it for the individual, and boils down to identifying who you’re trying to protect yourself against (threat model), compromising, etc.
It’s relevant to note that each tiny bit of privacy that you can get against a certain threat helps - specially if it’s big tech, as the video maker focuses on. It gives big tech less room to manipulate you, and black hats less info to haunt you after you read that corporate apology saying “We are sorry. We take user safety seriously. Today we had a breach […]”.
And on a social level, every single small action towards privacy that you do:
- makes obtaining personal data slightly more expensive thus slightly less attractive
- supports a tiny bit more alternatives that respect your privacy
- normalises seeking privacy a tiny bit more
and so goes on. Seeking your own privacy helps to build a slightly more private world for you and for the others, even if you don’t get the full package.
Maybe a bit old but nevermind
