• ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what’s the alternative? State controlled media? Because that’s never used to push narratives and agendas.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The more voices the better. State run, private, individual. Break up large conglomerates like Sinclair. Reintroduce fairness doctrine.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the elephant in the room that communists always conveniently overlook.

      “There never was real communism/socialism! We need to really move the means of production” - yeah and who will organize it? Who will ensure the organizers won’t just take it themselves? Because that’s what happened in every attempt.

        • fkn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The larger they get the more prone they are to becoming problematic. HOAs are a great example of this and require way fewer people before it’s an absolute shit show.

        • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They pay workers significantly less than capitalist competition though. Somewhat contradicts the bad capitalist exploiter narrative.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regulation on businesses and corporate spend.

      You can have free press if you limit who can influence it. From both corporations and the state.

      Prevent monopolies and the consolidation of news media. Promote dissenting opinions. Promote smaller news organizations and promote discussion.