• SuperFola@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Kitty is mentioned once in the article and that’s it. Doesn’t even mention its downside and how ghostty is so much better according to them.

    It’s a great project and all, but I’d love if people could stop stomping on others work just to appear better.

      • SuperFola@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Only says it’s fast on some specific benchmarks against alacrity. Not talking about why alacrity or kitty would not work on Linux/mac while ghostty does.

        Sure, it’s interesting that he managed to optimize so many things. But the claims in the picture are unproven.

        • tun@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Not talking about why alacrity or kitty would not work on Linux/mac while ghostty does.

          Does the picture/article claim alacritty or kitty would not work on Linux/mac? Where can I read that?