Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson announced Friday that he is switching parties and will serve as a Republican-affiliated mayor of the blue-leaning city.

While the Dallas mayoral office is nonpartisan, Johnson previously served as a Democrat in the Texas legislature. He slammed his former party in an op-ed for Wall Street Journal published Friday, blaming Democratic policies for “exacerbated crime and homelessness.”

“The future of America’s great urban centers depends on the willingness of the nation’s mayors to champion law and order and practice fiscal conservatism,” Johnson wrote. “Our cities desperately need the genuine commitment to these principles (as opposed to the inconsistent, poll-driven commitment of many Democrats) that has long been a defining characteristic of the GOP.”

He added: “In other words, American cities need Republicans—and Republicans need American cities.”

Johnson’s announcement makes him the only Republican among the mayors of the 10 most populous cities in the US.

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Texas Democratic Party issued a scathing statement Friday, accusing Johnson of being dishonest with Dallas voters.

    “[T]he voters of Dallas deserved to know where he stood before he ran for reelection as Mayor,” the chair and vice-chair of the party said. “He wasn’t honest with his constituents, and knew he would lose to a Democrat if he flipped before the election.”

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Real question is: why didn’t the democrat he would lose to win?

      Why are we voting for scumbags over non-scumbags?

  • Hotdogman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m the mayor of this town and there’s too much crime. So I’m switching parties. That’ll fix things.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a state that has a Republican legislature and governor. So how do the Democrats get blamed for a town that has too much crime?

  • bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    poll-driven commitment of many Democrats

    You mean the will of the people? You would subvert the will of the people for your own agenda?

    Hmm… sounds like a tyrant to me.

    • eoddc5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think what he is trying to say is that democrats make promises to appear good at the polls and get elected and then do nothing about the promises or whatever.

      It’s stupid as fuck. Especially since, as a Democrat, he made a poll driven commitment to be a Democrat to get elected and then did nothing about that promise.

  • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    I accidentally voted for one of these people in the last election. In a local race, only two candidates so I voted for the one with a D next to his name. After I mailed in my ballot I got curious and went to his website, he was full on pro-Trump MAGA. Not even hiding the fact that he was running as a D to get dumbasses like me to vote for him. He got me good. Touché. Won’t be voting blind again. Stay vigilant!

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was your alternative any better? Sounds like a race with two Rs (which can happen legit in my state, primary is top two, but it’s more likely to be two Ds)

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe the Democratic party needs to vet their nominees better. Otherwise it’s not going to be a political party anymore, just a name to exploit.

  • potpotato@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unemployment declines under democratic leadership.

    Fiscal conservatism isn’t going to house people.

  • vamp07@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stop complaining. This country has the best politicians money can buy!

      • Carlo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a Houstonian, and a rational person, I obviously hold a low opinion of the citizens of Dallas. That being said, and having done a modicum of research on the behavior of the lizard in question, I don’t know what the hell they were supposed to do. Shit’s fucked up.

  • Lexam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not saying its ok to assinate people. But I can understand why it would happen.

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meh. This really isn’t what it looks like. I’d guess he’s planning to run for a much higher office, specifically one where you do NOT get elected for such a position in Texas unless you have an R next to your name.

  • Armen12@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    A Republican Mayor in a Republican state doesn’t sound too unusual though, I mean, it sounds on par with Texas

    • mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now that Eric Johnson is a Republican, he should immediately denounce the Republican Party for the crimes of his city. After all, the mayor is a Republican. And then immediately switch party to the Democrats. Rinse and Repeat.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, Texas is kinda spiraling. The problem is the r’s make decisions that sound good short term and destroy things over time. The best purpose of a conservative party is to check the actions of a more liberal majority, not to lead.