• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fish is super useful, but I usually only start it up if I’m having trouble finding or remembering a command.

    • folkrav@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, it’s a good shell. I’ve found the lack of compatibility with some bash tools to be inconvenient enough that I just went back to zsh and found alternatives for the parts that I liked about it. Works well enough for me.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m relatively new to Linux in general (have only been on it for about a year and a half, but have taken to it like a fish to water), so forgive me if this is a dumb question, but what are some benefits to using zsh over bash? Are there any cons?

        • folkrav@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Honestly, it’s just another shell. Both Bash and ZSH happen to be mostly POSIX compliant, so stuff that works for Bash tends to work with ZSH too. For me it’s mostly just about the stuff I can add to it - I use the antidote plugin manager to get additional autocomplete, syntax highlighting, suggestions, async prompt updates, that kind of thing.