Access Denied
www.rfi.fr
  • toast@retrolemmy.comEnglish
    311·
    15 hours ago

    I eat tuna often, and I’ve never noticed anyone that can’t draw separate conclusions based entirely for reasons without cause or makes little sense. Evidence of heavy metal caused features resemble natural pathways just fine. It’s like spending worry about higher lead or cadmium. Who does it?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
      18·
      14 hours ago

      I keep trying to re-read and understand whatever it is you’re trying to say and I can’t figure it out, so I feel like one of us has had too much mercury.

      • megane-kun@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        6 hours ago

        If I am understanding it correctly…

        • They eat tuna often.
        • They never noticed anyone that cannot draw (separate) conclusions that:
          • [were] baseless
          • made little sense
        • Evidence of heavy metal (features) resembled natural pathways.
        • Worrying about high lead or cadmium [in food products? doesn’t make sense].

        Even laid out like that, it is still confusing. However, I think their gist is that:

        1. they think heavy metals’ effects [on humans] are indistinguishable from what happens normally
        2. no one can draw conclusions about heavy metals’ [effects on humans] that have basis
        3. they think worrying about heavy metal contamination in food is stupid and people shouldn’t worry about it
      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        71·
        14 hours ago

        I put it into ChatGPT just to see if it could figure it out. it was not certain, but the best it could come up with is that this person is skeptical or dismissive of the dangers of heavy metals in fish.