• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I do not blame Democrats for running a bad campaign.

    I do:

    1. no primary
    2. select the candidate who dropped out early due to terrible polling in 2020
    3. have pretty vague set of campaign policies
    4. go after celebs instead of appealing to people facing actual issues

    What they should have done is:

    1. run a primary, with Biden choosing to retire instead of seek reelection
    2. select the candidate voters actually want
    3. have a clear set of campaign policies
    4. appeal to everyday people with even an ounce of charisma

    The main issue people seemed to care about was inflation. The Democratic candidate really needed to attack that head on by explaining why inflation got bad, how it’s better, and what they’ll do to help wages continue to catch up. But instead, Harris made vague promises to “fight price gouging” (that’s not what’s actually going on) and give handouts to people to buy houses.

    That said, there’s no way any Democrat would’ve won my state, so I voted my conscience by picking a third party instead of picking either unqualified candidates. I just wonder how many people felt completely uninspired by Harris like I was, and I can’t help but think that cost her the election.

    • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      50 minutes ago

      I resent the idea that people need to be dazzled and appealed to in order to not sell the country out. Absolutely no integrity. No intelligence.

      Hence why I called all of you stimulus eater organisms. Paramecium. Fucking amoebas.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Once they decided to skip the primary and started getting contributions to a Biden/Harris campaign, it became virtually impossible to select anyone else once Biden dropped out. Only a Harris campaign could take over the money already raised for the campaign. Any other candidate would have to start fundraising a few months before the election starting from nothing, and would have been at a massive disadvantage.

      voted my conscience by picking a third party instead of picking either unqualified candidates

      Are you implying there was a qualified third party candidate? Is this an oxymoron?

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Once they decided to skip the primary and started getting contributions to a Biden/Harris campaign, it became virtually impossible to select anyone else once Biden dropped out.

        Right, and that was the first mistake, they should have held the primary.

        Are you implying there was a qualified third party candidate? Is this an oxymoron?

        I thought Chase Oliver was pretty decent. I especially like his immigration policies, I like that he’s pretty young, and he seems to tick off both parties equally, so hopefully both parties would have to actually work together to get something he can sign. I highly doubt he’d get any of his policies done (except maybe ending tariffs, which would help a bit w/ prices), so the main benefit of having a third party in the White House is as a moderator between the two parties.

        He had absolutely no chance to win, especially since his own party largely turned on him (I guess he wasn’t conservative enough or whatever), but I felt he was a decent protest vote.