threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to Don't Dead - Open Inside@lemmy.ohaa.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoWORK NOT HARD SMARTsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1137arrow-down11
arrow-up1136arrow-down1imageWORK NOT HARD SMARTsh.itjust.worksthreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to Don't Dead - Open Inside@lemmy.ohaa.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareNaich@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·2 days agoIt’s either “work not hard smart” or “work hard not smart”. Either way it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 days agoYou’re supposed to read pink, then red, basically like an x… incredibly confusing.
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·2 days agoEven then it doesn’t work:“work smart hard not”
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·2 days agoIt does, if you read it like this: 1 3 4 2 I.e.: like no one ever read anything
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-22 days agoWhat you mean do . I read like that. everything
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoAt least they got the top left correct. Don’t work hard indeed.
It’s either “work not hard smart” or “work hard not smart”. Either way it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.
You’re supposed to read pink, then red, basically like an x… incredibly confusing.
Even then it doesn’t work:“work smart hard not”
It does, if you read it like this:
I.e.: like no one ever read anything
What you
mean do
.
I read like
that. everything
At least they got the top left correct.
Don’t work hard indeed.