Frage an euch: Viele zögern, #GraphenOS zu installieren, obwohl es eigentlich recht einfach ist. Wie wäre es, wenn der Kuketz-Blog eine Dienstleistung anbietet, die die Installation gegen eine Aufwandsentschädigung von etwa 50 € übernimmt? Was denkt ihr – gäbe es dafür Interesse?

#android #datenschutz #privacy #customrom

    • GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      @[email protected] @[email protected] There are Critical tier remote code execution vulnerabilities for the GPU, cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth drivers. There are also critical remote code execution vulnerabilities for the cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth firmware. It doesn’t really get much worse than the kinds of things which have been fixed regularly. Current Tensor Pixels have dramatically better hardening and security features too, not only receiving current patches. A lot more to privacy/security than patches.

      • GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        @[email protected] @[email protected] Simply due to being on Android 13, you’re missing 2 years of privacy/security improvements to Android, over a year of our privacy/security improvements in GrapheneOS and 2 years of Moderate/Low security patches. The missing Critical/High severity hardware/driver patches is a whole separate problem that’s not fixable even if we received a massive influx of resources specifically for reviving support for older devices, which we would not do for ethical reasons anyway.

        • GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          @[email protected] @[email protected] We would not accept substantial money and developers given to us to both revive support for insecure devices and improve the rest of the project to justify it. Why? We do not want to encourage people to use highly insecure devices. We do not want to be the cause of people being harmed because they wrongly believed they were safe because we kept releasing updates for insecure devices where we cannot patch important vulnerabilities. It is not just about lack of resources.

          • GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            @[email protected] @[email protected] We’re no longer going to be providing extended support in the future. We only did it because 3 years of support was highly inadequate. We’re fine with 5 years of support and 7 years of support is fantastic. Even if someone reaches end of 5 years of support, they can purchase a 2 year old device as a used device which has 5 of the 7 years of support remaining. Devices having 7 years of support means people will be able to cheaply get used devices with lots of support ahead.

            • GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              @[email protected] @[email protected] Pixel 8a was the first device in the budget line with the 7 years of support. It’s still significantly less than a year old, but once it’s around 2 years old we think the whole issue of people not being able to afford devices to run GrapheneOS will be largely solved. It’ll get even better as it gets a bit older. Buying a Pixel 8a when it’s 4 years old and has 3 years of support left would not be ideal but would still be fine as long as people are prepared to replace it in 3y.