It presents a slight problem when the ones they’re bringing in to deal with the shitty politicians are the people who paid them to be shitty in the first place.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    We had 60 for less than one month almost two decades ago. Since then we’ve elected less every year and blamed them more every year.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Curious that, if all they need is 60 Democrats, why they didn’t seize that opportunity to try and deliver everything they’ve promised. Working 24/7 to pass bill after bill. And instead just squandered it…

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh yeah they should have asked the house nicely to vote to reform every system in the entire government in less than one month: you clearly do not want anything fixed, why are you being so disingenuous?

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah. I described to you why things haven’t been fixed and how we can fix them, and you responded that fixing it should have been done and that you don’t trust the fixers so you won’t let them fix it.

                Just be honest with your beliefs, you don’t have to sit here and bullshit about it. You don’t want Democrats to win and you don’t actually care about any of these problems. Why keep up the facade?