• luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are cases where it does hold. Trivially, if the wrongs are vastly out of proportion, someone is overreacting. For example, if you’re fixated on your phone, don’t look where you’re going and bump into me, that’s a mild wrong. If I respond by slapping the phone out of your hands and stomping on it, I’ve caused way more damage to you in retaliation.

        But in the case at hand, I’m with you: An obnoxious statement designed to invalidate someone’s complaint countered by another obnoxious statement designed to invalidate the previous one, thus defending the original complaint, is perfectly acceptable. The point isn’t just obnoxion, but a counterargument.

        • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          All words are made up. That is a true statement, not ‘a wrong’ thing to say.

          Just because it wasn’t polite doesn’t mean it’s wrong. You’re putting morals on how to correct people on a subject you don’t fully understand yourself.

            • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Interesting how your upset at the true statement said sarcastically, not the misinformed, incorrect statement said sarcastically.

              There’s a double standard you’re still holding on to here, and it isn’t about magic Internet points.