seaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 年前ADUHD rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageADUHD rulelemmy.worldseaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 年前message-square60fedilink
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Typically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Doesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Nope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice. But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.
Typically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
Doesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
Nope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice.
But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.