- 0 Posts
- 198 Comments
In my field it’s often general journal policy, not an individual choice. It’s hit or miss, as it can be easy to guess who the reviewer or author is in a niche field. I personally don’t go out of my way to figure out the author’s affiliation, even if it can be trivial. Regarding self citations, those are usually obfuscated at the review stage. I’d say that a paper is easy to narrow down to a circle of scholars, but it might be the first paper of a research associate, a throwaway paper by a PI, or a paper that aims to engage those narrow specialists. So is a kind of smoke screen.
I actually robot-fed my kitten from day one, so they basically don’t associate me with food at all, just with cuddles and reprimands.
Thank God for double blind peer reviews, warts and all.
5·3 months agoCool! The weight of responsibility of the spiritual guide for a community.
Tatakae!
14·4 months agoI remember playing with the little black and white marbles in the logo, or am I misremembering? I have tons of fond memories of the game.
Reminds me of a scene from Don’t Look Up
I see no indicators that this was AI. Lots of details, no inconsistency.
That looks like text photoshopped on a blank shirt, especially with how flat the text is.
My favorite band. This is one of the more traditional albums in terms of style, but also quite charming. Any similar bands? I can think of Haken and Toehider.
Eh, they basically are. It’s like the whole anti-Zuckerberg outrage. They’re just very visible examples, not some fundamentally different evil.
A company, in principle, cannot care about anything but profit maximization. Nestle isn’t evil, it’s merely more brazenly expressive of the amoral nature of capitalist production.
Hey everything, the massage is highly defined by now.
I like to imagine that he beat all of them up.