What about some platform that has as many facts as people can enter?
What about some platform that has as many facts as people can enter?
so a way to incorporate sources into the posts and judge them accordingly?
that and it is quite literally spyware that sends all the consumer data to the CCP where they can adjust their own algorithms to show things that can sway the minds of people too young to think critically
IIRC there were a lot of irregular things about shooting down a balloon with a missile. Like they never showed anyone what was found, and that guy who was filming the search party but suddenly had to stop and all that
The idea presented here is that what we currently see in the ocean is like seeing a primate in the jungle. That idea would not be a representation of humans too well, and whales would not be a good representation of what is being talked about here
okay then… “Smart” whales that evolved 50 million years ago with language abilities and are now responsible for the UAP sighting we see around the world.
With your extra information it seems even more reasonable that during this time some cetacean with comparable to human or higher language abilities evolved.
So far we have a limited understanding of the undersea world and any whale or dolphin descendant that can create what is seen is certainly able to keep themselves hidden if they wanted to.
No one said anything about whales coming from space though…? Not sure where you got that notion. The idea that a branch on the tree of life is suddenly from another world seems ridiclious don’t you think?
If these don’t meet road safety requirements then it won’t get better
didn’t the pentagon come out a few years ago saying there are 'ufo’s that are not US or other known nation’s. There are lots of possibilities that are not aliens from other plants but then again with some time a race could learn to use technology to live thousands of years naturally right?
What about the fact that fingerprints make great usernames but trash passwords? Perhaps the poor security and extra hardware and software are enough to discourage makers, they can add a variant with a FPS and if that doesn’t sell at all they won’t make many others.
“only in these circumstances”
Wasn’t that close to the wording in the Gore V Bush case
these justice are too corrupt to be trusted. Could more justices be added?
Looking at the lessons we and everyone else has learned from this R-U war it’s obvious that drones and electronic warfare are the crux of any future battlefield. These same weapons could be used across lines to inflict damage and confusion around a territory or country.
sustained growth can’t succeed along with the surroundings. I would like to believe that gross mismanagement would lead to the downfall of this once super cool website but I also think twitter is a stupid idea so I’m a bad judge of what will get funding. I wonder how much of that funding is shell corporations from intelligence agencies harvesting user data and training computer models though too.
Same idea except That’s my purse, and I don’t know you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfiWkXlOPyo
Yes having more connection with your community can help get more friends and a richer social life which can be helpful, but look at how insular people within communities over time have become now that we are now bound to the only interaction with those directly around us, via travel and communication.
online and even better local and also online groups are what I am going to argue would be the best way forward. Looking at the rAbetterWorld’s consensus engine and how it could help people male friends and combat loneliness I see how having easy ways for people to interact with those around them and discuss common interests could happen.
The idea is that a website or something like this and the other website but also like many other aspects of other websites; like how one painting is like another because they both have color you might say. The websites’s main idea is to find consensus on a topic, but the topic can be anything and there would be cross-subject like links for related things, but how related they are is something people could vote on and over time a consensus could be reached. In fact voting on everything is sort of the idea, but there are many types of votes that mean specific things. here though say we have a community of people and they are interacting on a popular topic, they could sort if by locality and talk to those around them. Now the idea here Quickly falls apart from what we might ever see happen because all the users in this theoretical system have to be verified like being registered to vote. Once verified you or any of your anonymous child accounts and be banned forever and your contributions reversed if the rules are violated too many times, and worst is who decides such a thing, the rest of the people who are eligible to vote on that topic. of course the votes are weighted based on your knowledge of a subject, but the questions about what is relevant are chosen by voting. Not all that voting happens from inside the group thou
Can I order these goods from our time travling agent? Maybe a pocket electron microscope, a bunch of capsule corp products, sanitation pills, maybe the bugout bag of some rich future CEO near the end of capitalism
hail vertical mouse corporate
did you never read that MIT guy’s research on the tin foil hats?
I’ll see ones that seem to show up visually but I’ve never ever been able to click onto it and move it.
Nice, it’ll never look that good again.
I find that when I favor one gear combo too much this happens and when it starts skipping links its time to sqitch it out