had to do it. it’s all I could see from the photo in the article.
had to do it. it’s all I could see from the photo in the article.
the government does, and what they do with it is harshly regulated.
the TSA is part of DHS but operates outside of DHS and can do whatever it wants with your information if you give it freely. it’s one of the reasons how that facial recognition apparatus works. it was developed by a contractor to USDOD and delivered to DHS for the TSA to use on the public.
DHS cannot investigate the general public without probable cause, TSA can. so what information they gleam from the general public is then shared with DHS, DOD, and sold back to the contractor as a part of the delivered contract. what they do with it afterwards is entirely up to them.
both accepting and rejecting the scan is harmful to your privacy. by accepting you are now indexed in a database and that information can be used in multiple government sanctioned investigations. by rejecting it, you are flagged as a concern and your profile is then processed through and algorithm to identify your threat level.
the TSA are doing more than just looking at your passport when you reject. they’re waiting on that threat level response to identify if you should be taken for further questioning.
conservative Americans be like
it’s a data collection point.
can’t scan AI recognition on your passport, so they get your consent this way and with an updated photo.
it’s the only thing that makes sense if they’re taking photos and checking passports.
let’s assume you’re correct. there’s still irrefutable evidence that she did the actions that lead to charges to be filed against her.
wouldn’t what she did be considered terrorism then? it was an act thats purpose was to inflict fear and chaos on the community and destabilize the local government.
if she was tried as a terrorist, and I believe she should have been, she would have been looking at life in prison.
so, is she a criminal or a terrorist?
it’s Ryan Hall y’all!
now you know why
this is great! now we can argue in court, “if it cannot be owned, how can it be stolen?”
“I’m rubber, you’re glue. what you do bounces off me and sticks to you.”
that’s basically what he said.
what a desperate little bitch. he can’t win against a war with a well stocked and trained army so now he has to resort to threats he can barely deliver on.
your threats are 1 out of 6 stars you basic bitch.
flour and water paste should work pretty well as long as there’s no wax or tape to block the paper bonding.
in your defense Amazon would spray their boxes with poison if it didn’t add any extra costs.
PSA: Companies couldn’t give a shit about you or your packages. the sooner you realize that, the sooner you’ll realize how insignificant you are in the world.
if it’s citrix you used to be able to modify the local connection config file to allow access to the clipboard regardless of what the server allowed.
been a few years since I needed to do it, but it was possible at one time.
related to another comment I made, the materials they used just don’t exist.
the wood they used to build a house in 1900 were from trees that were at or over 100 years old much of that time was never around humans or pollution. this means the growth rings were tight and dense. very sturdy. in California they were cutting down the great Sequoia red woods to build homes. much of San Fransisco still has redwood framing to this day. those trees are multiple hundreds of years old.
compared to the white pine we used in framing today, the tree is anywhere from 5-7 years old and are bred to grow tall, and fast. this makes the growth rings loose and soft. sturdy enough.
in fairness, the materials were cheaper then compared to now only because they were practically raw materials.
if you look at 17th century European construction and compare domiciles constructed for nobles vs commoners the only difference other than scale, is the quality of the post processing.
example; walls in a manor were stone bricks and plasterwork. commoners used the stone laying around(free) and had no plaster. lords had slate roofs, commoners had thatched (free).
as time marched on, the consumer market grew throughout the 19th and 20th century where homes were developed with manufactured/engineered materials. the cost of materials dropped due to supply and demand. lowest home development peaked in the 1990s.
after 2008 and then 2020, building a new home is far out of reach of most due to costs of materials and land.
one could say our ancestors had cheaper homes, but our ancestors would think we’re royalty if they saw the amenities we live with inside out homes today.
either way, we peaked in the 90s and will never be as prosperous in our lives again.
that’s so easy! /s
wow that only took like 4 years to do.
it’s going to be another 10 years before they see a dime though.
oh the wheels of justice are moving. watch as they roll over the victims and blame the driver, father time.
technically any vehicle can be remotely shut down if you’re high enough on a wanted list.
just ask Ayman al-Zawahiri, wait… you can’t.
good, we won’t read those either.