![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a63f2bfd-d771-487b-926e-8fd722e309de.png)
![](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/77ad0608-acf8-4508-bf30-fb3df37c6bac.webp)
How about, instead of spending millions on marketing and exercises or graphical virtuosity that do nothing in terms of playability, innovation and fun, focusing on what matters and do games where $70 still turns a huge profit?
How about, instead of spending millions on marketing and exercises or graphical virtuosity that do nothing in terms of playability, innovation and fun, focusing on what matters and do games where $70 still turns a huge profit?
At this stage, apart from my medication, I worry the most about my devices and chargers. Everything else, from toiletries to clothes I can buy if it turns out I forgot it and really need it. That lowered my stress with packing significantly (and I am not forgetting more things because of it).
Alan Dix’s book (aptly named “Human Computer Interaction”) is quite good, even if somewhat old by now. HCI is an actual academic discipline with, yes, tons of theoretical and empirical results that govern what a good UI should be. Many of which are indeed grounded in psychology, others in physiology, etc (what we call Human Factors). There is a whole special interest group of the ACM just about it: SIGCHI.
Do not confuse this with fashion/trends/taste. These change, resulting in widely different possible flavors of UI over the years. But the underlying principles are the same.
Another thing to remember is that the fact that Apple, Google, or someone else implemented an UI in a certain way doesn’t mean they are following best practices and guidelines. Novelty sells, even if at the end of the day it does a worse job of things…
Edit: added link to SIGCHI
This is actually a thing. When learning calligraphy, it was one of the exercises we did. If you have good enough control of your hand and pen, then all strokes should be the same length, slanted the same way, and separated by the same spacing. When you manage this apparent “unreadable” thing, it means you nailed it!
The example below comes from this site (not mine)
A rifle scope that can see through walls.
Neat! I’ve always been a fan of roguelikes!
#Rogule 2024-3-25 🧝 4xp ⛩ 93 👣 streak: 1 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⚔ 🐺🐗🧛 🌰🌰 🍄
Nicely Done! How did you do the eyes and mouth? These are a challenge to me. My default World be to sew some felt to it, but I hate sewing…
That makes total sense. Still, it removes the pressure of choosing a server, since migration and use of several servers becomes seamless. As it is right now, there’s the resilience and future lifespan of an instance to consider, plus fragmentation of your identify as defined not by your username but by your actual “online persona” constructed from your posts, etc. (unless you’re really going for alts, of course). You can create other identities on other instances but they are separate, you “lose” your posts, etc. if something happens. if I understood correctly, that becomes less of an issue with nomadic identity?
IMO, this seems exactly what the fediverse needs to thrive. The whole “choose a server” thing is a big disincentive to adoption by most people.
For when you hate camping but get talked into it by your friends and are determined to avoid all the parts of the experience you hate.
Quite the contrary. If you have autofill on and accidentally visit amaz0n.com or whatever, it won’t autofill, and thus signal you are not where you thought you were.
A shame it still costs $12 when selling to my country. Because, you know, the shipping costs of bytes over the internet are huge if they travel a lot… *$&$# amazon…
Indeed. A very nice read, and a very interesting take on an common subject/genre
While I’m not entirely sure wat it actually means, the message you get on that site right now might be the reason (some kind of experiment gone wrong artificially inflating the numbers):
I was creating an implementation for the activity pub instance service transfer, but it seems to have spread far. We are very sorry to those who have experienced inconvenience.
All temporarily used data has been removed and all data has been removed. The figures in the data will soon converge to zero.
I trawled unintentionally.
Is federated authentication being considered for the future? The federated model of the fediverse is great, but it runs into problems when instances “die”, you want to access different servers as they federate with different things, etc. leading to the need of having multiple accounts. If there were a decentralized network of auth servers, could use the same credentials everywhere.
99% Invisible - An excellent design/architecture podcast
20k Hz (“twenty thousand hertz”) - great show about the audio that pervades our daily lives, from notification sounds to movie special effects, passing through game sounds, sound history,etc.
Imaginary Worlds - in their own words, “ a podcast about science fiction, fantasy and other genres of speculative fiction”.
All three are done by professionals in their respective fields, exceedingly well researched, and with superb production values.
The problem is that the concept of “user of a site” is still a thing. There should just be “fediverse users”. Everything gets federated, why not user credentials? Then it would not matter if you register on site X or Y. It would be the same. What we need is a federated identity service. It would still be completely decentralized, dependent on no single server, and much more resilient to server shutdown, defederation, etc.
Edit: typos
Went through this some years ago with my daughter. She was around 8 and came home from school all excited about Pokémon cards, as some colleagues started showing up with them. After getting her some, I realized that they liked to look at them, compare powers, do the odd trade and that was it…
Still, I feel it all got sorted out in the end. That fleeting interest planted the seed of interest in TCGs and now she’s 11 and we regularly play MTG against one another 🙂
Estas certe bonaj kialoj por ne pagi per karto (ĉefe, privateco). Tamen, ĉi tiu artikolo estas iom fuŝa, ĉar (laŭ mi,la du plej gravaj fuŝaĵoj…):
ne ĉiuj kartoj estas kreditkartoj. Fakte, en pluraj landoj, preskaŭ ĉiuj uzas debetkartoj. Do, oni ne devas pagi pli ol la veran koston de la varoj…
ĉu ĝi vere diras ke oni devus ne pagi niajn Impostojn?! Ne nur pro baza justeco oni devas pagi (nepagantoj estas parazitoj de la pagantoj kaj la socio), sed ankaŭ ĉar, aparte de militoj, ĝi ankaŭ pagas niajn vojojn, malsanulejojn, lernejojn, ktp…
Jesus! Fucking! Christ!
As someone who fears bugs and is browsing Lemmy before going to sleep, my nightmares thank you, good sir!