deleted by creator
deleted by creator
So, all the 31 dead are children?
Genuinely asking because of past events like this one:
Amnesty International has documented that Ukrainian forces have been using hospitals as de facto military bases in five locations, a clear violation of international humanitarian law. In some instances, soldiers were even seen firing from near the hospital, turning these civilian structures into military targets and endangering lives.
Source: France24
deleted by creator
OP is becoming infamous for spewing nonsensical “articles” that break multiple rules with every post. Yet, because he moderates seven (yes, seven) communities, no one seems to care. It’s almost like a comedy routine.
deleted by creator
Who still “trusts” a celebrity?
People with self-esteem lower than a snake’s belly and as basic as a rock.
Yes, and read your whole one year comment history. You were definitely a redditor, right?
Make burning coal illegal already
Perfect citizen
Congratulations sir, best comment I read since I joined here.
Thought it wasn’t as bad as their neighbor to be fair.
15 years for stabbing someone in the neck, regardless of their job, seems fair, imo. Let’s compare some other cases:
Spain does nothing that’s not told by the EU
Edit: ok the guy seems to call everyone a troll. Nothing to see here folks.
Did anyone read this? It has nothing to do with actual news. The article focuses on isolated incidents like Matvey Volodin’s forced cooperation in May 2024 and his arrest on June 5, 2024, alongside Yusuf’s detainment. These specific dates and sensational stories are definitely not news.
It also violates several rules:
I support LGBTQ+ rights, but sensationalism isn’t the way to advance the cause. It’s surprising why this is so upvoted
If you genuinely believe Putin called the Taliban “allies,” you must be reading a different script. He mentioned their control and stability role, not a formal alliance. Misinterpreting statements to fit your narrative doesn’t make them true. Maybe next time, try actually understanding the context instead of cherry-picking quotes. Don’t bother to reply btw
Actually, The Guardian is not just a “publication,” it’s a British newspaper. But thanks for the geography lesson. And by the way, whether it’s British or not doesn’t change the fact that the UK media often mirrors Washington’s stance. Keep up with the grown-ups next time.
Actually, I did read the article. You clearly didn’t, since you missed that the headline is not a direct quote. Putin acknowledged the Taliban’s control and their interest in stability, which aligns with Russia’s goals, but didn’t flat-out call them an “ally.”
If pointing out these facts is nitpicking, maybe you need to brush up on your reading comprehension before defending misleading headlines.
Looks like someone’s quick to play the paycheck card whenever their sensationalist nonsense gets called out. Just because I’m not buying into overblown headlines doesn’t mean I’m on someone’s payroll lol. Maybe try engaging with the facts instead of resorting to cheap shots.
Did you read my comment?
I laughed louder than I should have.