![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
I said terrorist attacks, not violent crimes. Dont move the goal posts
I said terrorist attacks, not violent crimes. Dont move the goal posts
Alright, name the 122 terrorist attacks made by Europeans since 2015. Ill wait.
Tractor supply serves people in rural areas. What did yall expect? That Jose and Tim would think like someone from LA?
Okay, it was everyone who owned a gun and a shoestring. Sure, gun owners are no longer allowed to lace up their shoes. Heres a link to the letter. Thats a sensible rule. https://old.reddit.com/r/progun/comments/p46y9n/just_a_reminder_that_in_2007_the_atf_classified/
Furthermore, its posted on lemmy, which that license overrides the license on the comment
Removed by mod
Why would I? Putting a license in your comment doesnt mean anything, its not legally binding in anyway
Pretty easy to do after 9/11, Nice, Vienna(2021), Dresden(2021), the list goes on. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_terrorism_in_Europe
When multiple groups have declared Jihad against the west, a little more caution should be exercised.
Remember, immigrating is not a right.
You do realize that license doesnt do anything, right? Facebook tier logic right there
Oh so youre just a contrarian. Got it.
If you cant handle a democratic election not going your way, maybe you dont belong in politics.
And maybe you shouldve curbed immigration instead of making it a wedge issue, and only having the far right party be for curbing it. Just a thought
Making owning shoes a felony is ridiculous, and I honestly cant believe you’re arguing in good faith.
And a shoe string does not create a firearm that fires more than once with a single actuation of the trigger.
The ATF went completely off the rails with that one, and it shouldnt have been a challenge of how constitutional it was, it should have been a challenge that it didn’t fit the law.
More like they can still make those ruling, but now instead of them being challenged solely on a costitutional basis, they can be challenged on whether or not they follow the law in question.
Defining moldy is one thing. Declaring shoestrings to be machine guns is another
Youre doing Lincoln a disservice. And Washington too.
Obama droned a lot of kids, he really wasnt that good
Thats a good thing. Unelected officials should not be passing laws.
Didnt they do that in the original?
Im not, unless you think abortion is birth control
Why would we? We’re against murdering babies, not for controlling women.
Their hobby is working. Thats the difference.