[ <333 + ] z³ ///{)“Meow Meow”(}| ¥

  • 8 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 15 天前
cake
Cake day: 2025年6月28日

help-circle
  • Understandable, it’s still against the true morals of Anprim ideology, although i guess there is no good way to practice unless you have the land.

    As for the argument above, why isn’t it our place to say what anarchy would look like in the future? Sure, we may not be the final voice of the movement, but we sure as hell can’t go in blind unless we intend to be completely secessionist insurrectionists.

    If we have no active place of residence as a people, how can we ensure anarchy stays alive? I mean that in the sense of anarchist action, I know very well that ideas can live on for as long as they are thught. But, what if not everyone likes anarchy, and they are not specifically a governing body? We must ally if not everyone is okay with living without a state, right? How can we expect ourselves to be able to rely on ourselves when our opposition outweighs our numbers? How would an anarchist society interact with say, a passive capitalist nation? An authoritave socialist nation? Are we to be gullible and accept the enemy of our enemies as friends? or do we be rational and treat our allies like accomplices?

    We must plan so that the fight won’t be as bitter, why stop and drop everything at the whim of “the anarchists perfected plan; improvise and follow the rule.” Not to completely deconstruct your entire argument into a simple statement, but it is exactly what you describe, this is not how we progress as a people.

    “Point out the hiearchy and power structures, and oppose them at every turn.” Is a pretty good standpoint for the basic idea of revolt, but HOW do we oppose an entire nation? HOW do we point out power structures in systems we don’t participate in? HOW will we be able to define the hiearchy of other states? The big picture is there, but in order to actually understand what’s in it, we need to analyze the smaller parts first.

    When i say “How?” i really mean, “What?”

    For example, In what ways do we oppose an entire nation? As stated in the original post, what kind of role will we play in revolution? Do we become pirates? Underground black market criminals? Wreckless revolutionaries? What are the possible choices we have, and how do those choices benefit us?

    I’m sorry to be so hostile with this response, but what you give me just doesn’t cut it, you can’t tell a person “Hey paint that fence.” and expect them how to paint that fence if they don’t know what the tools for painting are, if they don’t know what fence to paint, and even more so, if they don’t even know how to paint in the first place.

    So a vague call to action definitely is not enough to establish a game plan for generations to carry on, it’s definitely good to keep a statement like that in the back of your mind, but it doesn’t carry much confidence when the very practice itself isn’t being implemented into real world circumstances on a scale that is as signifigant enough.

    So obviously the people need some help, I made this post for those very same people, so let’s help eachother out please, the time for discussion is over!





  • Puddle has been wet for a while, infact, it’s practically almost an inland ocean, why do you think we’re funding drone wars? Ai computing? Quantum computers? tactical robotics? Surveilence companies like Pegasus, Blackrock, Palantir, Even our our domestic surveilence is getting a larger check than defense. It’s a very deliberate “funding” of institutions that ultimately give the police an upperhand, not saying that the police are directly funding these institutions, but rather the state, although not much when it comes to anything outside the defense budget.

    There’s a reason why privacy advocates are for alternative tech, and that’s because since 9/11, corporations have become “lobbied” for lack of a better word, to include backdoors and implement certain tech to aid a surveilence state, such as the removal of headphone jacks, the endorsement of useless and extremely vulnerable tech that’s more energy wasting, blutooth products (yeah i have a problem with it, everyone should), fingerprint sensors, front and back facing cameras, artificial intelligence (yes even the older models.), and even going as far as to add metadata to photos that give your exact geolocation data.

    Don’t even get me started on the invasive software that comes with the tech, like auto generated albums, or auto editing photos, the such, it pisses me off that we let these things happen. Alternative tech makes it much harder to intercept such vulnerable information, ofcourse, it won’t completely stop it, but it mitigates how much they can swipe under your nose.

    Not only that, but check upon the “Blue Shield Act,” it explains the motive for corruption within the american institutions of police, hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. It’s the common trope for the kinds of psychopaths that would be okay with doing the job in the first place. If there’s one thing that makes their job easier, it’s definitely going to be you in cuffs staying silent, so why try to steer away from cutting corners? We’re the law, what we say is final. Until it isn’t ofcourse…

    But that’s the problem, as you state in your comment above, this abuse of power is shrugged off, almost as if a normal behaviour, expected. It’s digusting to see it even when i grew up around the same mentality. But hey, at least their method clearly seems to be working, we’re practically silent seeing as they still have the confidence to fuck with our lives.

    Just remember, it’s final until it isn’t.

    Blue Shield/Blue Wall/Blue Code https.//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_wall_of_silence






  • I don’t understand how we’ve become so dumb that we simply can’t turn a knob for gas and strike a match for a flame. Or, well atleast dumb enough to accept these kinds of shitty products on the “free market.” I understand having convenience in your life, but at the cost of this? AND a higher price all for some “super smoke” and “timer” option.

    Is this the technofeudalist dream? If the next big thing in smart tech is to add ai to grills to “get the perfect sear” or whatever, just kill me.





  • I definitely understand that, it takes time to get used to “wanting” to wake up.

    I feel like if that happened to me though it would motivate me to find something different… not throwing shade, but it’s what i would do. Though sleeping in isn’t that much of a bad thing when you have time to sleep in, no need to be punctual about it as long as you don’t let it go. Balance.

    Anyways, sucks for boss cause if i’m late then there’s no reason to rush myself any further. I’m still going to work, still doing my job the same, they simply just don’t understand that.



  • if you wake up at 4:00 then you have like 3ish hours of free time to wake up and do stuff before work or whatever. Tons better than waking up and forcing yourself awake with coffee to then take a 5 minute microwave heat shower to then rush yourself and your soaked slippy ass to the car where your hair looks weird and you look and feel like a wet skunk in a swamp summer.

    Pass, i will take a cold shower in the dead of night, to then go out for a smoke while it’s still dark, and come back inside to enjoy rice bowl in the atmospheric glow of my dim lighting (a must for waking up while it’s still dark), the rest of the time is just spent waking up, catching the news, maybe a show or two. I love it.

    please consider the method, it will exponentially increase your mental health, rushed mornings tend to make you feel “forced” and it causes stress over time, not helpful if you have to work a lot, and doing it will actually make you want to sleep instead of forcing yourself to do that aswell.

    Don’t force yourself, find balance in your life.