Who fact-checks the fact-chekers, There is the real problem?

This.

Most of the tech stack is american controlled and that is a security and privacy risk to everybody. From instruction set architecture to control over the social media. To American enemies, American allies… american’s themselves nobody is safe… probably the those that are best at mitigating said risk or take any steps at all are the American enemies.

I haven’t had much hope that if there was an major asteroid racing towards earth that there could be much done about it, but I also know that likelyhood of it is very small so there is no need to lose sleep over it.

Trump isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed, but he is still infinitely more cognizant than his opponent. Biden is mentally barely above a fucking vegetable at the worst of times and at his best a couple of gaffs is the new normal. This article just attempts to do “bothsidism” for Biden, now that nobody can no longer deny that the man is demented, so they try to make the case that so is Trump, just trying to level the playingfield narrative wise.

political elites in Europe are afraid and fear upheavals are coming in the coming years and months because of the cost of living crisis and the war. They try to clamp down beforehand to preserve their own power. This always happens when things go bad. The leash is kept looser when people behave and it’s tightened again when the opposite happens. There is no real freedoms that is given to the people by the elites, because what concessions they give willingly they can just as easily take away when they no longer feel like it. Provided that they think they can get away with it.

Nice and fun, took me like 5 mins to finish tough.

tbh, a word being a slur depends on the use case. No word in isolation definitely is or is not a slur.

it’s not like human brain memory or consciousness is that information dense. They just did that high of a definition of a scan.

Re-establishment of clans and tribes will soon become an economic necessity for the poor. Unions would of course be better, but I’m not holding my breath.

While wikipedia is decent at giving overviews on some scientific and technical topics, but when there is a topic about something that is historical and/or any way politically or monetarily relevant there will be an edit war to change it to suit one interest groups wishes or anothers. It really is a cesspool of psyops, misinformation and articles to be basically corporate PR at certain topics, and that is just because google usually gives wikipedia articles as first or second result on any given subject and it’s a really cost effective way to propagandize people and doing it is really low cost. Now Russia just monopolizes the propaganda inside their own borders.

International law in this context just means that a single global hegemon can no longer push everybody else around and call it’s will and interests “law”, and therefore claim that it’s interest somehow benevolent and part of how just things are. That is exactly what “rules based international order” means.

Not that we have ever had any law that equally applies to everybody equally. All laws and even international law needs a hobbesian Behemoth that is more powerful than any other to enforce “international law” and is in the end above it since it is at the best position to enforce and set the “law”. The UN and it’s institutions are basically basically a discussion club by design and it can’t do shit so post 1990 world the Behemoth has been the world hegemonic United states. Now that US has declined relatively as Russia, China, India, Iran, etc have risen it finds itself unable to enforce anything through hard or soft power and therefore the idea of law, stability and peace under US dissipates. Not that it was ever lawfully, peaceful or stable, that illusion only applied to the western core nations of this now dead American world.

No onko nää asiantuntijat nyt niitä samoja ihmisiä jotka puhui hävittäjien puolesta tai lobbasi juuri F35:sta tänne. Eihän ne nyt ikinä tule sanomaan että joo virhe tuli tehtyä, olin väärässä, perutaan kaupat.

All of the sanctions and European energy security were banked on the idea that Russian frontlines would collapse under the super Nato equipped Ukrainian counterattack and then there would be a regime change in Moscow and gas would flow again. Now Ukraine is on the backfoot, there is no change in Moscow and Russia oil still flows to Europe, but only through intermediaries and loopholes, because there really never was an short to medium term alternative for it in the way the global oil market is structured. The sanctions were actual serious sanctions and their architects thought that they would actually work, but the decisions were made on faulty assumptions of effectiveness of sanctions and the structure of Russia economy.

wtf is this comment 😅

Germany has been the second largest military supplier to Ukraine after the US. They are very much providing for that war too.

For german government “Never again” meant just never again genocide against jews. All other people are fine and free game.

They will try it again in like two to three years from now. This time they will just do a under the radar and somewhat diluted version of it.

And who decides what is being taught if this is to be solved with education? That still just falls into the same dogma enforcement that presupposes objective truth especially in political matters. it just turns from censorship to indoctrination of some kind. There can be no real discussion about political matters if it’s presupposed that there is such thing as objective truth in some hard science sense in political discourse, because then every side in an argument from a position of objective truth and there is no way to compromise or approach the other side when everybody are either heretics or believers to your side.

No helppo lääke on tuomita Israel ja saada aikaan tulitauko. Kestävä ratkaisu on sitten eri asia, mutta voi yksinkertaisemmillaan ottaa sellaisen muodon että toinen osapuolista murskaa toisen.

Uskon että koko artikkeli on liioittelua. Tähänkin olisi kuitenkin helppo lääke. Nimittäin tuomita Israel ja saada aikaan tulitauko ja sitten joku kestävä ratkaisu Gazan ja länsirannan suhteen. Tää on tietysti mahdotonta Euroopan hallituksille, koska jenkit ja britit seisoo kuitenkin israeli takana ja Eurooppa ei ikinä seiso yhdysvaltoja vastaan. Hamas taas on lähempänä Vietkong kuin ISISiä ja kaikki mahdollinen terrori tulee, random lone wolf toimijoiden käsistä, jos siis tulee, eikä Hamasin tai hezbollahin. Ei kuitenkaan ole Euroopan hallituksilla muuta ajatusta päässään kuin tuomita palestiinalaisten taistelu oikeudesta kotiinsa ja siten luoda ISSI:kselle ja vastaaville se tekosyy. Veikkaampa vaan että jos jotain lännessä tapahtuu niin se tullaan myös spinnaamaan siltä kantilta, ollaan nyt sodassa Israelin rinnalla “ääriliikkeitä” vastaan ja tätä sotaa voidaan käydä tukemalla Israelia entistä enemmän tavoitteeissaan luoda etnovaltionsa puskutraktorein ja pommein.