Oh that’s not a fuckup in my book!

You’re already doing what a good moderator separates you one from an average one: engage, explain and adapt!

I appreciate that! And moderating topics like these is frankly nearly impossible as it’s a clash of science and “moral”.

My gist is simple: NSFW is literally: “would you mind a coworker seeing you looking at this?”. After all marking something as NSFW is a form of self censorship: “I recommend you not looking at this at work!”.

From this I deduce two things: a) text should have a higher barrier for NSFW than images. Other people need to actively read what you’re looking at and it’s way harder to claim that text is not workplace appropriate compared to a picture of primary sedual organs. b) What’s actually depicted and said? The Wikipedia page about human reproduction falls at least at my workplace not under NSFW although a penis is clearly depicted.

Now to the OP: it’s an article discussion the struggle of sex workers (well promotion of a book about it but same same). The issue here is that marking articles like these as NSFW perpetuates the core issue of the content discussed: that this is a woman problem that should be talked about in private.

I guess that’s where the majority of downvotes come from as well: “this should not be viewed in the workplace” is a catastrophic signal in this context for the message.

Now to your point of respectdirectly: OP doesn’t disrespect the people who filter out NSFW content because this article should be visible and even discussed in professional contexts if we as human society want to progress. It’s source is a newspaper, it’s content socially relevant and aimed at (provocatively!) educating and it’s topic is sadly very relevant.

All of this is my personal opinion of course but I wanted to leave you with more than just a two word comment!

This is the exact headline of an established newspaper. Wherever you’re allowed to have your phone or for reading at work then this should be just as fine.

Please be consience on what NSFW should be and don’t call for censorship in its name.

Ironically fitting to the article itself.

Black and White was really fun for me as well for a time - it’s basically a god simulation combined with a zoo game as you have to grow your avatar basically.

Loved populous back then, if I recall correctly I even liked two more than one!

I’d expand it to director plus or similar, i.e. for people who lead other people with personell responsibilities it starts making sense to have three rounds imo.

That said I share your gist!

Yeah but that’s - to be clear - bullshit distraction talk. That’s not “people” as in many folks, that’s politicians distracting from the difficult discussions (i.e. Inflation) and trying to rile up people. At least in my social bubble it didn’t work - it was mocked a bit and then forgotten.

As they are closed source no one can tell you their true privacy policy. It seems better than average from what I’ve read but you never know…

Personally I use logseq and sync the files via a Nextcloud instance. I can only recommend it, although I also recommend spending an hour to learn the tagging and linking logic and reading through their guide on what’s possible. I still only leverage a minor part of the potential myself.

One that is closer to onenote (I think, never used onenote) is Joplin.

The link throws me to the “pay for this api” page, most likely not what you intended OP!

Yeah I had a brainfart, meant namespace…

And thanks a lot for this writeup I think with your help I figured out where I went wrong in my train of thought and I’ll give it another try next week when I have a bit downtime.

The time you took to write this is highly appreciated! ♥

Do you have a link at hand on how start a process within a specific veth by chance? Own name spaces are easy enough and a lot of tutorials but I don’t want my programs to ever be not in the vpn space, not at startup not as fail over etc.

That’s the reason why I stuck with the container setup, only for gluetun plus vpned services.

I have to fullheartily disagree! From my point of view this is an exciting dystopia - the same way Russian roulette is “exciting”.

I wouldn’t have thought that we as species speedrun the shadowrun tech dystopia in addition to the expected corporate oligarchy one - on not, not instead!

This feels like doing 200mph on a highway and someone telling me that they now can - and in fact started to - alter my breaks on the fly. “boring” just doesn’t cut it anymore for me.

This comment is so wild to my non US eyes. I had to convert the sqft you gave because I missremembered. Friends of mine are family with two kids and live in a bit more than half that space (80m2) - and are not the exception from what I know.

To see 130m2 “too small for the family” is really weird and I’d love to see/understand where the differences come from. I guess that even how the space is calculated might have an impact. Really fascinating!

Thanks for sharing!

I don’t know why you think that this is projection on the OPs part.

Personally I don’t find that “suspense” part that you describe. I fully agree that she has a highly successful career and fan base - doesn’t mean her humor is for everyone.

Personally I’m curious to see the series and I find her way less annoying than some of the past people which were highly popular (Cooper and Stirling for me personally).

I’m more curious than worried - and could fully understand that someone expressed “oh there’s this comedian I don’t enjoy, too bad. Oh is that something I shouldn’t say about this person specifically?”.

https://media.ccc.de/v/gpn22-443-balkonkraftwerk-ohne-balkon-oder-wie-ich-lernte-lobbyistin-zu-sein

Bei mir ging es, allerdings mehr ein teaser denn ein voller Artikel…

Too bad that some of those are quite certainly made up. At least for the Voltaire one I even have a very in depth source:

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/08/13/no-enemies/?amp=1

Doesn’t take away the fun for me though - thank you for the collection!

Deine Krankenkasse wird sagen “Nein, die Leistung wurde nicht erbracht” und die Praxis dann: ok, hier ist die privat Rechnung.

Wenn du letzteres lieber möchtest sprich die Praxis einfach drauf an, dann kriegst du die Rechnung statt der Unterschrift.

It literally is!

I appeal to your intelligence: please consider that any action has more than one aspect, more than black and white.

Your assumption concerning my intention for example is straight wrong - as I stated in my very first reply. Where I also agreed with you. I didn’t write to be “right” or “wrong”, I interact to get new experiences. As I’m only getting shut down as “wrong” I will stop trying that here (that’s my perception about your intention. I could be wrong).

I apologize for wasting your time and won’t interact further.

Are you aware that I am not the thread starter? You’re talking with two different people.

Well you seem to know more about why people do what they do than I do. But as “everyone” knows I simply must be behind.