Why did he skip 3 and 4? It’s just not right 😜

This and the chicken presentation are my favourite pieces of academic work https://youtu.be/yL_-1d9OSdk

I miss screamers (even the attempts)

A cardboard box (and put something in it so the parents won’t look at you funny)

I’ve spent some time reading the Wikipedia article looking for the relevant part, I guess I was 10 mins early (didn’t get the chance to see your comment before that). Here’s the (probably) corresponding video, the first video result when searching for the freestyle javelin technique, in case it helps anyone: https://youtu.be/52rvqtiBoow?si=RiLjhJG2ttv-0s1W

I don’t know why this was also my exact same first thought

Normally I struggle to hold my attention even for short videos, but I watched this from beginning to end, and that (to me at least) says something.

Next to upvoting, I’m just writing this to potentially get your comment ranked higher for this post.

Maybe that’s what we should get: yet another trilogy where they rebuild but without the attachment nonsense and other unhealthy jedi practices. Though I’m somewhat conflicted when writing ‘yet another trilogy’.

At least it has something in it, not just a piece of paper with an online download code…

I may be missing the point, but why not instead list names in whatever order, but clarify who contributed what.

I’m a manager, and this strip nicely brought out my main insecurities about the role. Thanks for pointing out that there are other things one may contribute with, despite losing (or never having) abilities in the three mentioned aspects. It’s not easy to let go of depth, and exchange it for width and longer term thinking.

These days I’m highlighting one or two keywords per paragraph, so people who get scared by my extensive writing get to have some non-scary starting points. They say it’s appreciated, but I’m still not sure how much is actually read…

Maybe to add, after having read some of the linked comments, that the survey is cool and all but that’s it. It triggers people to explain their process of how they tried to spot things (as good experiment participants should), but I have only seen one comment on the purpose and methodology (as a researcher would). For whatever interesting research question, the data selection doesn’t allow for insightful answers. We can interpret these results as we want, and as we can see, people are already taking what they want from it. Sincerely, Reviewer 2

I got a 9, while even knowing the two examples in this post, marking way too many as AI generated. But it got me thinking, seeing the deviantart links for the non-AI images: though maybe those are not generated by single prompts, there is a chance of heavy AI involvement in the process, one way or another. So I would actually be curious what the practical/applicable purpose of the survey was.

Bocs, hogy nem tudok hozzáadni a listához, de talán a komment segít feljebb hozni ezt a posztot: én egy kicsit bajban vagyok az olyan ‘közösségek’ létével, amikor pl a fenti egy olyan, ahol én még kommentet nem láttam, a cikkek egyetlen helyről jönnek (mondjuk én is csak azt olvasom hazai hírekkel kapcsolatban), és minden poszt bármiféle komment indító hozzászólás nélkül jön. OK, ott van, kezdjek akkor hozzátenni valami szörnyűlködő vagy utálkozó kommentet, esetleg valami random szóviccet?

I’m kind of waiting for the pteranodon to appear there…

Are they still called footnotes if they take half the page? (I prefer parentheses though)