Yes.

I’m actually glad it ignored so much of your prompting.
Turned out super sexy!

Amazing.

The food doesn’t do anything for me but those women sure do.
Nicely done!

Very nice. Thank you for posting

There’s an update now, I was able to login.

Sync updated. It’s working now (for me.)

I imagine some people want their main instance account to include porn. Not how I would (and do) operate, but simplicity would be a reason.

For example I have my phone set up with Island to duplicate my apps for porn use separately from the direct installs. It’s a hassle. I can totally imagine wanting to just not bother if one’s life situation allows for that.

Interesting side effect for the audience: A top level comment might contain both art I like and a theme suggestion I dislike (or vice versa) so voting becomes a little complex/strategic.

I’m not complaining, just pointing that out to keep in mind as pictures come in.

I don’t care one way or another about the hair, but those are some mighty sexy women you’ve made.

Wow.

The video contains sex. It also contains boobs, but wouldn’t have to (doggy for example) - conversely, a post at boobies would not need to contain sex, but might anyway.

The two communities would be orthogonal.

However, what is mildly confusing is that [email protected] is a discussion comm, but this one is media.

I was just meaning to ask this. I have a list of 42 communities I’m subscribed to on this account that I can’t add to my pornlemmy account, and I’m sure there are more. Some of them are from lemmynsfw, some lemmit (but others work fine), some lemmy.world, etc.

Nice!

First issue I see - at least on my browser (Kiwi, chromium based. On Android), usernames are not showing on the feed view - they do when opening a post or in the ellipse menu for a post on the feed. I tried both light and dark modes, and tried clearing cache.

Extra padded bra

I get the reasoning, but I do feel that the rules are Way too strict on artwork (as opposed to pics/video of real people) to an unprecedented level. I’d like to see that reevaluated to be more in line with what other sites that allow NSFW permit - if they were facing legal trouble over that content, then they would ban it too, so I think it’s pretty evident that they don’t.

In particular this whole concept of establishing a “canon age” for every character and disallowing aged-up art strikes me as much worse than simply disallowing any art that looks underage.

I’m pretty sure that’s only possible instance-wide (like on beehaw)

And I vote strongly against disabling downvotes on this instance.