Linux gamer, retired aviator, profanity enthusiast

  • 37 Posts
  • 4.91K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle





  • End users didn’t know how email or the world wide web worked once upon a time. There’s that clip of Katie Couric asking her producer “Can you explain what internet is?”

    In the years since, they figured it out.

    And as I pointed out recently, people figured out how to play WoW even if you have to pick a server before you can start playing. My understanding is different servers have different modes, like there might be one where PvP is enabled, etc. so there’s a clear reason expressed why you might pick one over the other. I’ve noticed Fediverse instances are really shit at that.

    I signed up for Pixelfed recently, and the Join Pixelfed website’s page where you pick an instance had a bunch of tiles that read something like this:

    | Pixelfed.de

    |

    | Pixelfed is an image sha…

    Fist of all the description for the instance started out trying to explain what Pixelfed as a whole was, and then it was truncated to about a quarter of a tweet with no way to expand it right there.

    I’ll take this opportunity to bang on once again about everyone wanting to make general purpose instances with no attempt at finding a niche. I’ve been saying this since joining; every instance decides it needs a c/funny or a c/linux or a c/cats or a c/games and so then there ends up being 40 of each and the one on .world or .ml ends up being the de facto one everyone uses. Then you get a page where you have to pick from lemmy.world, lemmy.ml, lemm.ee, lemmy.ca each one giving the first fifty characters of the definition of Lemmy as their description, yeah no one’s going to open another browser tab and end up doing something else when confronted with that, huh?












  • Right at this moment: content and performance.

    If I start looking around at Peertube, will I find anything I’m interested in watching? There’s a LOT on Youtube right now, what’s on Peertube?

    There’s a tendency for alternative platforms to be wretched hives of scum and villainy. LBRY for example felt like the place racist shitheads were banished to when banned from Youtube. The difference between LBRY and Peertube seems to be “something something blockchain.”

    I noticed a video from a channel called The Giddy Stitcher titled “How to start a (good) Flosstube channel” which for a second I took to mean Free Libre Open Source Software tuber, as if she was going to give tips on how to run an channel on Peertube. No, apparently “floss” = textile arts/string/whatever and that term is similar to “woodtube” for Paul Sellers et al. She apparently uses Peertube to mirror her Youtube videos, and gets thousands of views per video on Youtube and maybe a dozen views on Peertube.

    Anyway, watching this video, it buffered HARD. It got better after awhile but…you remember how, back in the day, you could just pause a video and it would buffer? And how it kinda doesn’t anymore? It was also that. They don’t offer lower qualities below 720p50 which probably doesn’t help; I’ve seen Youtube jump all the way down to 144p to keep the video playing at all.

    I know, Peertube is “some people” while Youtube is run by Alphabet. But, maybe we should standardize on lower resolutions and aspire to HD later on, huh?


  • Google may have shown us a revenue model because of how mouthshit they are. “We’ve demonetized this video for no reason we’re willing to articulate.” Okay, I won’t rely on AdSense then, I’ll monetize my channel by:

    • Merchandising. Sell T-shirts with catch phrases on them or things related to my topic at hand. The New Yankee Workshop made its money selling project plans on broadcast TV decades before Youtube was even a thing.

    • Patreon or similar. Allow fans to subscribe to the creator out-of-band, and reward higher donations with anything from a name in the credits to early access to content or even patron-only content. Youtube accidentally allows for that kind of thing. Wouldn’t it be funny if Peertube became a good place to put patreon-only videos instead of having them on Youtube at all?

    • Independently negotiated ad-reads. When Tom Scott looks to camera and says “This episode is sponsored by NordVPN” Youtube didn’t get a cut of that.

    Assuming an audience large enough, this could support the creator, and then perhaps the instance can then bill creators.

    I don’t know about technical help, like…Peertube has a P2P aspect to it where if you watch a video, you might help seed that video to other viewers, which helps shoulder the bandwidth load for the instance. If I’m a video creator, can I become a permanent peer for my instance and always seed my videos? I figure that would help more than…not doing that.

    Youtube did what Internet Explorer did: It got the general public used to the idea that an entire category of something on the internet is free. IE set the maximum price for a web browser at $0. Youtube did the same for video hosting. Can that be reversed?