more info here: https://lemmy.world/post/9542946

Yes, I tried again an again to reproduce the perchance text2img but there is really something behind the scene. The hidden stuff make the difference I think. We know the model (for photo it is alternatively deliberatev2 and realistc vision), he said he use no lora, “no embeddings, no fancy sampler stuff, no hi-res fix, no hidden ‘quality’ prompts” BUT “there is hidden stuff to reduce suggestive/nudity/etc”. I tried to use negative prompts like “nsfw” , “porn” and things like that, but I never have exactly the same thing as in perchance. It is very frustrating. please @[email protected] , could you help us ? it will literally take you 2 minutes to explain the full settings and we will all leave you lone about it lol thank you very much !!

Thank you for your answer !

could you please tell what was the previous model used for photo (before “realistic vision” which is , imho, less good than the previous one), and the sampling methods/steps and the hidden stuffs you used to reduce suggestive/nudity/etc (I supposed these are hidden prompts; right ?): these “hidden stuffs” can make a big difference on the results (SD is very sensitive to small changes)! I don’t have bad results on my local automatic1111, I just try to have the same results with the same prompts; and so I just need these simple infos (and I think it’s the same for other people who asked for them). thank you !

It’s not sure that he use deliberate v2, because even with it you won’t have the same results as in perchance generators. Maybe he used euler A too , but really, we need infos directly from him. And I think the settings were changed a few days/one week ago, the results are now slightly different

Deliberate v2 (or Artius too, but I don’t think it’s the right checkpoint) but like you, I just can not replicate what I do on perchance. We need to know the exact checkpoint/lora’s and the settings / the hidden prompts (but all the “art style prompts” are known, check my post) ect… in fact it can be explained in two minutes ahah but without it, we can work during months without to find the right settings lol so yes, we need the help of the Dev ! please !!! ^^

I think the hidden prompts/settings have been changed recently ? The results are different than before with the exact same prompts. The text2image generators are still very good, but it’s frustrating to depend on settings that can change at any time without having any control over them. So it could be so cool to know the models/lora and prompts/settings (if possible the previous ones) used for the generators ! please ! ^^

yes I understand it can change later on. But for now it’s impossible for me to have the same result with the exact same prompts+prompts art style for example with deliberatev2 and I made tons of tests with a lot of models+sampling methods, it’s very very frustrating. In a few seconds the dev can resolve all my problem with just a message or even a private one, by telling me the name of the model + lora (if there are any of them) + prompts under the hood, actually used on the generators .

Could you please ask him if it could give me these simple informations ? it will help me soooooo much ! I just would like to replicate what I have on the generators but on my automatic1111, that is all ^^ and it’s just about to have the right models/lora and prompts/settings, it’s very easy ahah ^^ but without these infos it’s just impossible to do it

deleted by creator

thank you ! but I think it is really about the model (+maybe lora)

My point is to experiment prompts on the perchance generator: it’s super fast , easy to use, it’s super cool !!! And then I would like to use the prompts I experimented on perchance and that I like but on my pc, to add things like Lora and stuffs like that and with better resolution, to improve it. But for that I need the same model (+lora if there are any) of course

Is it possible to have all the info ( the name of the checkpoint merge/model and lora for example) or if it is a custom ones to share it ? it is the same question as in the “post regarding the model” and honestly you (perchance) kinda evaded the question ahah . if we don’t have the “recipe” (model and lora if there are any), we can not replicate what we do on perchance and so it is less usefull to work on it because the prompts won’t have the same results, you see what I mean

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

thank you ! well I think my problem is the “art style” settings of the perchance generators that I don’t replicate with the right prompts/tags. maybe it is because I use “easy diffusion 3” and not automatic1111 ? is all the exact same “art styles” on automatic1111" too ? I use easy diffusion because it was way easier to install ^^ because for now I just can’t replicate the results of the generator on easy diffusion while using the exact same prompts and settings (mainly guidance scale), the only thing which is not the same is the “art style”, on easy diffusion they are “Image Modifiers” but they are not the same at all. Or if the “art style” are specific to the prechance generator, it could helps a lot to know what each of them add to the prompt text

You also have to log out to see the ads, this is what I do everytime I use the Perchance text2images generators, and so I have the ads and I hope it helps. But I am willing to donate me too ! I’m using a lot the texte2image generators and it’s just incredible it’s free ! with every other ones (good ones) you have to pay ( and a lot if you make a lot of tests as I do…). So I don’t know if ads make enought money for the server gpu’s. I’m sure we are not the only ones ready to help a little. So I think it could be a good idea to have a way to make donations I think ^^