I can hear this photo

“Voting for Harris is like having an affair”? That extrapolates into some pretty creepy implications about how they see their and their wife’s relationship with Trump.

They think it’s okay to do because they think they need to “balance out” the enormous amounts of voter fraud they’re convinced is being committed by Democrats. The problem is, that’s a complete lie, the Dems have done nothing. Every news story I’ve read about voter fraud in this election cycle (3 or 4?) where they actually mention the party, it’s been a Republican.

When Trump wins due to you not voting for Kamala, and lets Israel and Netanyahu have every weapon they need to “end the war quickly”, by which he actually means finish the genocide of the Palestinians and any other Muslim caught in the crossfire, are you going to celebrate that?

Edit: I agree that the Democratic leadership needs to do more to help the Palestinians. They are at least trying to get aid through and attempting to curb Netanyahu’s worse impulses. Trump has already said he wouldn’t. Israel is a US ally, like it or not, and the government will support them in their defense. If you want that to change, it definitely won’t happen if you let Trump take office.

And if you vote Republican again in 2028, surely the hardship will be overcome in that time. Or maybe 2032 when we get there.

Trump’s got so much projection he oughta open a movie theater chain

Trump “ending war in the ME” = let Israel bomb the crap out of the ME.

The best way to help Trump lose, which would keep him unable to retaliate, is to endorse Harris. But I suppose he also doesn’t want his billionaire taxes raised a few percent, which is a faint possibility under Harris.

He’s already been judged a rapist, if they supported him after E Jean Carroll this new allegation isn’t going to change their minds

Safe? Clearly no. Trigger lock? Cable lock? If one were there, there should be a mention of picking it or cutting it. Unloaded? Also clearly no.

There are so many ways, any of which take a whole 20 seconds, the parents could have used to prevent this from happening.

While that is a confusion-clearing thing to do, my understanding is “who” is used in reference to people, and “that” refers to things. So, grammatically incorrect but semantically correct.

A French term of endearment is “my little cabbage”

I had a little silver one, apparently marketed to the ladies as it had a little mirror. But flip phones were completely Star Trek TOS - Scotty, one to beam up.

I’ll bet a good chunk of donations is going straight into the Trump family coffers (thanks Lara!) leaving little for the actual Republican candidates and incumbents.

That’s true, but I was implying that the Trump campaign will just claim the rule is “serve”, or claim “serve” was meant, not caring what the actual rule is.

Oh, they’ll weasel their way around that. “He was elected but was not allowed to serve by those cheating Democrats, and the rule is a president can’t serve more than 2 terms” blah blah blah

Step 3, Assert that Americans have a god given right to drink unpasteurized raw milk, and imply that it’s more healthy.

A pro Trump acquaintance claimed that Trump had been acquitted this week of his 34 felonies. I told him he should start reading better news sources. (The clearest evidence that that didn’t happen is the fact that Trump hasn’t said anything about it, because if it did, you’d never hear the end of it. )

I took a Waymo robotaxi in San Francisco a couple weeks ago. It was easy to use and I felt very safe; generally they drive like your granny. My second ride we ended up briefly stopped behind someone trying to do a left turn in an unexpected spot, and the car wavered left and right for a moment as it tried to decide what to do, not unlike human drivers. Given Tesla’s not so great record on full self driving, I think given the choice I would probably stick with Waymo.

I think you’re thinking of Simone Giertz?