eduardog3000 [he/him]

The book is also pro Zionist and pro apartheid South Africa among other bs.

Yeah, doesn’t Israel open their border wall to let Palestinians in and it ends up letting the zombies in?

I thought it was just like implicit biases. But nope, apparently it’s literally textbook.

Iberia
Albania

wut

cringe

Like, Linux is fine whatever, but the way you’re presenting it is cringe.

Ads, forced updates, bloatware, and the fucking data collection

Literally all of these can be disabled or removed with about the same level of knowledge and effort needed to run Linux. Hell, my copy of Windows (Education edition) didn’t even come with ads or bloatware.

PS: any negative comments about Linux will result in a ban, the mods are onboard with this :)

Is that a joke? If not that’s pretty dumb, we can’t criticize an OS?

It doesn’t have to be random and independent. If neither sibling has power over the other (any more than any other couple), one proposes it, and the other accepts despite never having thought about it before and perhaps after thinking about it after, there’s still no problem, that’s literally how consent works.

You could argue that since it’s illegal, victims who are already adults will be afraid to come forward since it was technically illegal for them too once they became adults.

But like I said, the compromise is making only same generation incest legal, or making a certain age difference illegal so stuff like siblings and cousins where it’s a lot less likely to be grooming are fine.

I can’t remember the specifics, but it’s something like women over 40 have just as much chance of producing a birth defect as incest. The real problem comes when incest is repeated for multiple generations, like royal families did. But that’s extremely unlikely without the “royal blood” concept anymore.

Abuse is abuse. It’s not consensual, and would still be treated as such. We have the same policy for workplaces, schools, and prisons like you said.

If most cases are abuse then those cases will still be illegal, but because they are abuse, not because they are incest.

A sort of compromise could be keeping inter-generational incest illegal, but not same generation. But still, setting the illegality criteria at actual abuse makes more sense to me.

(Hot?) take: consensual sex is consensual sex (minors can’t consent ofc). It might be gross to most people, but so is gay sex.