How are there so many stupid people here already?

If you’ve got something you’re that worried about keeping private, go home, and break everything with a computer chip, a radio/network. Because if it’s not listening now, it’s only an update away.

All your base are belong to AIs

Sounds great right?

What Goldman does, others do.

What happens when everyone reduces their new grad hires by 25%?

The finance industry be shaking in their boots. They know when the machines take over labour, they screwed.

Assuming it’s not cached and sent next time it talks, of course.

Only their word until someone does it with a sniffer. E: I suppose, or looks the source but someone answered better now.

Note: Unlike other browsers that rely on cloud services, Firefox keeps your data safe on your device. There’s no privacy risk of sending text to third parties for analysis because translation happens on your device, not externally.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/website-translation

HL3 will be a secret minigame you unlock after you beat the HL1 & 2 minigames on hard. Of course HL3 will have been worth the wait.

Nah Gabe working on a god tier game. He just want to be able to say the same thing we all do… “you mean, you have to use your hands?”

Where we’re going, we don’t need peripherals.

Just Gabe working on a god tier game.

I believe the solution is curated data models with the top members of the applicable field determining validity or a stack overflow model.

I think you’re on the right track here, but will retain the same flaws ultimately this way.

Personally, I believe the models should be open and all interested parties have varying degrees of influence over the accepted truth. That’s going to be a complicated in itself.

By limiting it to “trusted people”, you only have to corrupt enough of them, and eventually you end up with the same shitty problems, but with bots too.

It’s just not ready yet. Vr in general is too awkward, inconvenient and expensive. The stuff that’s available now can be a lot of fun, but it’s a long way from where it needs to be, to “change the world”. And yeah, I wouldn’t want it for free since the acquisition.

Well AI fact, in this use has always been made up of a combination of man’s fact and fiction. Nobody’s been smart enough to make an AI that can reliably separate the two, to my knowledge.

Yeah, sometimes even whole albums need to be together. Or groups of songs. The convenience we have today is amazing.

Old and new can mix surprisingly well.

I had burned cds with different songs, a lot of pearl jam and nirvana, more tool though. Older stuff too like pink floyd, led zep, bowie, etc. Carried around about a dozen.

Oh right, if you save your passwords in the Google browser, or your Google phone… They might be stored in Google’s servers in some fashion - to allow you to share them between devices for example. But you do have to enable this functionality (assuming Google isn’t evil).

Well outlook is a complicated one, your credentials absolutely need to be stored in a place your (pop/imap/…) mail server can read from. Else how can they be validated. So if that’s Microsoft, then technically they have your credentials.

Any mail provider that isn’t evil, won’t be able to read your stored credentials until current one way encryption methods are no longer safe

e: in the case of stored/shared browser passwords, I that’s two way encryption… That’s less safe, I recommend not doing so if you can handle the inconvenience.

If Google and Microsoft are reading all of the emails in gmail/o365 (they could), then half of your data is probably getting caught by the recipient, or quoted in their replies anyway. Along with your email address of course. It’s a losing battle.

e: oh you’re worried about that. There will be a token that maintains the authentication, Google (probably) won’t have your Microsoft password - they don’t need to store it, or even use it ever. The technical term is SSO (single sign-on), if you want to delve into it.

Yeah it’s really not that difficult once you get the basic concepts, then it’s navigating your own maze of rules :p

Things like ausearch, aureport, audit2allow make light work of it.

Yeah I nearly panicked for a second there, then I remember noone’s getting near that anyway. Back to my relaxing weekend.

Which is interesting in itself, what if AI by chance produces a likeness of you, unintentionally. Is there an AI that has a database of all of us to know that? I’m sure they’re trying, for whatever reason.

Now, if you’re someone famous, like a pop star or president, chances are there are a lot more images of you in those databases, which could also skew the resulting images.

So I guess, what we really need is some way to trust the image, otherwise … I really don’t know how this can be avoided, maybe a smarter entity does.