Why is it an issue that she is affiliated with Trump?
If anything, this is a great development for Democrats. Loomer is incompetent. So we should hope that Trump is listening to her
Why is it an issue that she is affiliated with Trump?
If anything, this is a great development for Democrats. Loomer is incompetent. So we should hope that Trump is listening to her
Name the criminal statute he should be charged with violating.
Agreed that he likely does not have a 1st amendment defense. But you still need a specific criminal statute to charge him with. I am unaware of any that he has likely violated with his xenophobic remarks
Demagoguery that targets a marginalized group is an American tradition. It is unlikely that he committed any crime
You realize that by demanding people shut up about genocide, you’ve actually incentivized users to talk about genocide, right?
that’s not an option
Why?
It is a viable option. There is nothing preventing the Democrats from opposing genocide
Biden could do so tomorrow. Harris could then continue that policy
She will have the same position on genocide as Biden
Kamala will be the same as Biden on practically every issue
Which overall, is fine.
But on this issue of genocide, is damning
I want zero genocide
The Democrats want genocide
The Republicans want genocide
I want zero genocide
especially her being the first ever presidential candidate to mention security and self determination of Palestinians in a speech
She did?
This guy screams I am a white cuck
Like he stands outside your window and does this?
consistent with a trend that is quite obvious
What trend?
sealioning
Using terms like this makes one sound socially maladjusted. Which makes sense given the site we’re on. Which reinforces my point that a random comment has no representative value - people on here are STEM-brained weirdos or are bots. Either way, not exactly representative of the median adult US voter
So if the above person was familiar with Whitmer then I should presume that most people also are?
Your points aren’t making sense. Anecdotal evidence gathered from a non-American child’s comments on a random post on a fringe STEM-lord website is not representative of anything.
I am serious that anecdotal evidence is not statistically significant and that, therefore, one random child is not representative of anything
The child above me and their lack of knowledge has no relation to prudent political decision making, and their opinions are not reflective or representative of anything
A random ignoramus on the internet does not determine anything, much less what is wise for the country or the Democratic Party.
don’t know enough about Whitmer
Then you aren’t informed enough to even be talking about this
Why was that more profitable for them? Isnt the permanent maintenance of a slave underclass the most profitable structure imaginable? Assuming you aren’t meaningfully concerned about them revolting
What do you mean about this being the reason slavery ended?
What are the enumerated elements of that per the statute, and how did Vance violate them?