I thought “honest” would be obviously satire but guess I’m wrong, I’ve added satire to title
I thought “honest” would be obviously satire but guess I’m wrong, I’ve added satire to title
They stand to gain nothing from making a proprietary platform
Why would that be possible? Wouldn’t the developer have their server rejected any calls from “unsigned” apps?
Umm actually, EVs currently have higher total service costs
Harris Walz should make policy announcements from this thread, surely they would get a ton of more votes
Cold start is a hard problem for recommendations. It probably shows what’s popular in the nearby locations and/or matching demographics. Why’s it not normal?
Did those using tutor AI spend less time on learning? That would have been worth measuring
Bad headline. Should have titled as ‘AfD is better at promotion on tiktok’ or something of that sort
Good point, thanks!
From the team’s perspective, Lando overtaking him would be beneficial, right, since it would be a 1-2? If Charles pits, yeah, it makes sense to respond, just no need to do it before that since mclaren has a faster car. But yeah, if ferrari was much kinder to tyres, I see the point…
Thanks!
Thanks!
This is probably makes a good case for open sourcing all governing algorithms
Technically, buying a vehicle isn’t mandatory
You’re right, there’s no point in general public following these news. When a lab publishes such, it’s meant for other researchers. The other researchers can try to build upon. It might become useful or as an inventor put it - discover a thousand ways of how not to do it.
When you see big numbers reported but see the deployed improvements in single digits, that’s coz the big number improvement gets deployed many years later.
Would have been nice to add insider trading by anyone in government to this list
10 year payback period sounds great if you’re staying there long term
It’s just support and upsell