realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 个月前but idk tholemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1987arrow-down115
arrow-up1972arrow-down1imagebut idk tholemmy.worldrealitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 个月前message-square49fedilink
minus-square0ops@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 个月前Well only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
minus-squareYAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·11 个月前You can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
minus-squareALostInquirer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 个月前Where might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 个月前Let’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
minus-squaretetris11@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-211 个月前Theoretically, I had underetood the opposite.
Well only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
You can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
Where might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
Let’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
Theoretically, I had underetood the opposite.