• BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Short answer is yes, even the Guardian calls her out for not saying anything about capitalism.

      I’ve been pretty fascinated with the press coverage the book has gotten because it seems like a Pinkerian “look things are better than you think” spin on climate change that’s emerged as a counterweight to the “doomer” takes in the wake of the latest IPCC reports where the panel’s contributors have gotten increasingly alarmed. I think it’s a sign the capitalist class is still pushing individual lifestyle changes and “techno optimism,” and I’m wondering whether it’s going to keep sticking.

      • davel [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Steven Pinker and his ahistorical, immaterial toxic optimism were the first things that came to mind when I saw the words “it’s not the end of the world.”

        • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Okay, having listened to the interview my impression of the book is that it’s a textbook case of capitalist realism. The only solution is growth, the market will provide solutions (it seemed like her two strongest arguments were renewables are cheaper than petroleum and electric cars are getting cheaper). She seemed to get genuinely flummoxed by questions like what about the state interests in maintaining oil consumption even if it is no longer the cheapest source of energy and what about public transportation. I thought the interviewer was really patient but it was a little bit shocking that someone with a PhD from an elite institution who wrote a book about climate change came across as someone who barely understood the science.