I mean like why? Just open and update when I’m done that’s what every other browser does. Stop making me wait to use the Internet firefox!

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    9 months ago

    The better approach would be to prepare the update in the background and swap out the version on the next start

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m on Windows and I don’t recall the last time I was inconvenienced by a Firefox update. Like… I can’t even remember what it actually does. OP must be running it on a potato or something.

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I thought it did too, but this post says it’s different? Maybe they’re wrong. I haven’t double checked.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I think Firefox works like Chrome does here. Both give me a little notice in the menu that a new version is ready, and Chrome is a little more annoying about it (turns yellow, then red). I need both for work, and I much prefer how Firefox does it.

          • drawerair@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What I noticed – I turned on my 💻, opened Firefox then Firefox was updating. It was fast. So it hasn’t been annoying so far.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The only time I’ve seen that is if I haven’t updated in a super long time (e.g. on my Windows partition, which I use like once/year). If I’m using it normally, it installs in the background and I get the new version when I relaunch it. I primarily use macOS (work) and Linux (home), so I guess it’s possible my occasional Windows experience is how things normally go, but I think that’s a special case for when FF is so out of date that it’s unsafe to get without patches.

  • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I disagree. Software not terminating immediately is grounds for uninstallation. It should update silently while it runs.

  • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Ubuntu has an even better approach. It updates silently while you are using it. Then your tab crashes. And when you retry it tells you to restart firefox. Truly genius *cheffs kiss

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      As an Arch user. I wanted to use Arch at work too. Well, they want me to use Kubuntu (or any other prefered Ubuntu, but I like KDE so I do what every other dev uses)… except for Home Office ofc. Arch.

      Still. I hate this stupid update thing. Suddenly I get 20 notifications of KDE system wanting a reboot because of updates and Firefox doing exactly this.

      The worst. When I open a new tab by middleclicking a link, the tab crashes. I restart Firefox and the new Tab is gone forever. Sometimes its easy to get what I saw but not always.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m running a 12 year old laptop with 80 tabs open. Last time I did apt upgrade and had to restart the browser it took about six seconds.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        My T400 and T480 are nearly indistinguishable from my ThinkCentre M70q Gen 2.

    • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It matters more when you clear history and cookies automatically at close. You lose your entire session.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Then… don’t do that? You can clear history and cookies manually really easily, so if you restart your browser less often than Firefox releases updates (every 4 weeks), you’re just opening yourself up to hacks by running an insecure browser.

        • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Huh? I restart firefox multiple times a day, I was simply trying to point out that if you have automated updates and automatic clears of browsing data enabled you’ll run into this. I’m not about to start doing so manually just because the browser restarts itself.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            You can have automatic updates without automatic restarts. I have automatic updates on my work Mac and it never restarts itself. My other computers are Linux, so I control when those get updates.

            • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You can automate linux updates, and this can be enforced through your organization. So, no, it is not always in the users control, like in the case of having unattended upgrades in linux enabled with enterprise software.

  • brainw0rms [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    huh? at least on windows, firefox just uses its background maintenance service to take care of updates. no admin needed. I don’t even notice when it happens, except for the occasional “what’s new” page that opens along with firefox.

    • ksharp@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There is a comment below where someone posted a picture of the settings. Clearly it is insanely easy to make Firefox update in whatever way you want: automatic, manually, automatically in the background.

      OP completely ignored facts and only wants their moment to stand on a soap box with their stupid and lazy complaint.

  • Raffster@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’ve not used it on linux I guess. Update at some random point in time while you use it. Now I understand why it does it, but it’s just horrible terrible unforgivable.

      • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, it’s done by the package and when you configure it to, which in practice is right now.

        Actually, that’s one of the things Ubuntu got right with Snap (hate is as much as you want). They install the new version in the background without interrupting your flow. The next time, you close Firefox and choose to open it again…tada… it’s the new version.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I know when I update Firefox with pamac that when I next open it it’s going to need to update. It takes 3 seconds and restores my open tabs afterwards. It’s really not so bad.

        • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not likely. Windows doesn’t like modifying open files, so the installer would probably request you close Firefox. Linux will happily change the in-use files underneath the browser, Firefox notices and prompts you to restart the browser when you open a new tab.

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      The flatpak version updates in the background, doesn’t interrupt if its already running, and is immediately on the latest version the next time you run firefox.

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think I’ve ever noticed Firefox updating. The only sign I get that it updates is that when it does a special tab opens telling me about the new features.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is what I hate on school computers, and it drives people away from Firefox.
    You don’t have admin privilege, you can’t update, so don’t even try.
    I always disable auto-updates on those.

    • ArtificialLink@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      , my work computer requires admin permissions to install anything. But for some reason, especially with Firefox or any other web browser. You can just click cancel on the enter the administrative password andshit screen and then it just installs anyways.

  • woodgen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Applications updating themselves… must be a Windows thing. Didn’t they want to copy package management from Linux? Maybe AI can help.

  • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I imagine for security best practices, software prefers update on open (if not update on checking a central update server regularly like yum -whatever update), but for user convenience this would be better for so many things.