• Bigoldmustard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They can and do. You’re right in a way that ignores the context of the situation you are commenting upon.

      The context is:

      Valve can seem to do very little and win.

      Publicly owned companies are often pressured to “diversify” or “cut costs” to give dividends to shareholders.

      As a privately owned company valve is not beholden to shareholders or takeover risks.

      Imagine I said I don’t have to worry about car payments because my car is paid off and you said “some cars suck”. That’s how right you are.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It only ignores the context if you’re assuming I am saying Valve is one of those private businesses that sucks. Having shareholders doesn’t mean a company will suck, just as being private is no guarantee it won’t suck.

        Imagine if the comment I replied to said “the sky is always blue” and I pointed out that sunrises and sunsets can be orange, pink or purple and entirely black at night.

    • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, but they aren’t legally required to suck to appease the shareholders like public businesses are.