• grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Regulations help protect people from corporations. This libertarian take is total nonsense. What makes competition difficult for new entrants is the overwhelming size of modern day multinational corporations and the capital investment required to wage any sort of real competition which is something that is only going to be fronted by other extremely wealthy interests. So, yes, we do need bigger, stronger governments in relation to those very powerful corporations, specifically strong enough to break them up. Or ideally nationalize them entirely.

    • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      People who say stuff like this have never tried. You’ll never hear a person who actually starts a business say anything of the sort. Usually insane tax rates is their gripe.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      That is kind of true but it also protects corporations from small businesses. For example min wage harms small businesses much more than large corporations. You can like the “protection” but then you will get what you get with corporations and costs. If you opt for the bigger government then you will get things like unaffordable houses and inflation, so dont complain when you get what you asked for.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          It was a populous example and if you want to get into the weeds on it we could, but it wasnt the important part of the comment.

          I love how you guys claim that sort of economics is dumb as you cant afford a house and to feed yourselves. Modern monetary policy is working great!!

          • grte@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Our current economic situation is the product of decades of regulation cutting supply side (aka neoclassical) economics championed by the likes of Thatcher and Reagan, which still dominates today. You know where housing is not unaffordable? Vienna, Austria. A place where better than half the residents live in social housing. The product of a strong government and regulation.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              So your theory is that housing is so expensive because of less regulation? And if we had more regulations in how houses are built housing would be cheaper?

              • grte@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yes, of course. Banning short term rentals for example is a regulation that would put downward pressure on housing prices. Banning investment companies such as Blackrock, Blackstone, etc from purchasing single family homes, duplexes, 4-plexes and the like would do the same. Whereas the lack of regulation around these things has contributed to home price inflation. The idea that people are unable to afford homes because there is too much regulation holds water like a sieve.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  That is hillarious, I can tell you dont know anything about how housing built. Have a great day!

                  • papalonian@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    It’s really frustrating that you read the comment outlining the kind of regulation that would help, yet you somehow think the only kind of regulation possible is “make houses harder and more expensive to build” and dip out of the conversation with a “wow ur dumb lol”. It’s almost as if you’ve been arguing in bad faith and have no information to back up any of your takes.

                  • grte@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Yeah, all that housing in Vienna appeared from nowhere.

                    But sure, you have a great day as well.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ok but without regulation you get poverty wages, 12 hour shifts, 6 day work weeks, and food with no nutrition unless you think lead is a vital mineral.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          This is not 1812 anymore. If it were like that why wouldnt you just work for yourself or an employer that treats you well?

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Lmao

            Just among so many other things, like the lead poisoned baby food from March this year, you clown, the FDA was established in 1906, and Republicans are, right now, trying to abolish child labor laws and hiring 12 year olds in meat packing plants.