• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Nothing in Hawaii? I thought there was an entire island that only allows tribals

    Edit: Wikipedia article had a lot more recent history than I remember noticing - Bill Clinton signed an apology for overthrowing the Kingdom. It looks like they needed self-governance to be a tribe but that was blocked by Supreme Court as racist - I may be misunderstanding

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Now show me another one with number of tribes gone over the last five hundred years.

    I bet the numbers are bigger but I’m too alien to prove it

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      They decided to keep the name “Indian” because when white people decided to start calling them “native Americans”. They decided that they weren’t going to let white people dictate what their name was a second time.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Some prefer Native American others prefer Indian. Most seem to prefer referring to their specific tribe if you aren’t speaking about all Indian tribes. The import part is to use neither as a negative term.

    • bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      White people said it’s racist to call Indians Indians, but Indians said they don’t want to be called ‘Native Americans’, so we call them Indians again.

      By „we” I mean you. To Germans they’ve always been Indians.

  • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The footnote about “totally removed” is a little odd because I think some/many of these states has state recognized tribes.

    Which I think mostly means either the tribes just refused to ever sign a treaty with the federal government, or just kind of reassembled after the bulk of their tribe was driven off the original land.

    Virginia, North and South Carolina, and Georgia, for example, all have state recognized tribes.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-recognized_tribes_in_the_United_States

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Which I think mostly means either the tribes just refused to ever sign a treaty with the federal government

      In Georgia, it was the opposite: the Muscogee — or at least, an asshole tribal leader purporting to represent them — did sign a treaty. He got almost immediately executed for selling out his people and the legitimate leaders sent a delegation to DC to repudiate it, but it was too late and the tribe eventually lost all its land anyway.