• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I went on a blocking spree several weeks ago, and suddenly, most of the conversations on the topic were magically allowed to have nuance. Only had to block 8 or 9 instigators who were apparently the ones derailing every conversation.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      I have a block list of about 40 thats taken a year to curate, and yes, Lemmy has been absolutely fantastic since I filled it out. It’s like wearing noise canceling headphones.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        29 days ago

        Right?! I almost gave up 6 months in but getting over my hesitation to just block and move on was a game changer.

        • kitnaht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          My only problem with that, are that those instigators are still here, instigating others. I’d love to see a site feature like 4chan has, where they geolocate IP addresses and put a flag next to your user name. I know it can be bypassed with a VPN, but I’d at least like these little shits to at least have to use one. Rack up the flags on the username too – If the IP address changes from Russia, to USA, put both flags on the user. Set a super-cookie on browsers that tracks alt-accounts and connects them on the back-end, etc.

          I believe in anonymity, but I don’t believe in people making up identities and alt accounts, etc in order to ‘dogpile’ their own conversations in order to make it look like more people agree with them than actually do.

          I just found out that my boss does this shit. He’s got 3 facebook identities so when he’s losing an argument, he jumps on “Richard” or “David” to dogpile the conversation and make it look like more people agree with him on internet arguments.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            29 days ago

            I just found out that my boss does this shit. He’s got 3 facebook identities so when he’s losing an argument, he jumps on “Richard” or “David” to dogpile the conversation and make it look like more people agree with him on internet arguments.

            Wow. That’s… unironically very sad.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              The people who really suck tend to be really sad the more you learn. Like dude, I’d pity you if others didn’t have to put up with your crap. Now I’m just angry and feel bad

          • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            29 days ago

            That’d catch some, yeah, but based on what I’ve read on join-lemmy.org and some of the Github issues, I just don’t see the Lemmy devs doing anything remotely close to that.

            Not to mention, it’s incredibly easy to spin up sock puppet accounts on several instances (like you described your boss doing…omg that’s sad lol).

            The concern trolls also usually stay within the community rules, so it’s often difficult to do anything about them even if you successfully identify one.

          • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            29 days ago

            See that’s what you implement one time paid account creation for.

            Minecraft doesn’t stop you from making a bunch of alts to grief with, it just makes you pay up so that scaling up VERY quickly starts to hurt more than the trolling is worth.

            Also, differentiating profiles and accounts. IE an account can have their personal profile that’s linked to their friends and family, but then they can also have a public profile that they send any public statements and communications through, and they can also have a profile that’s dedicated to fielding and delivering all their furry R34 commissions.

            So people will THINK they’re able to go wild and outsmart any blocking rules by switching to an alt profile only to realize that the ACCOUNT is what gets blocked, not the Profile, and that they are gonna have to cough up if they really want to go that nuts just to troll someone. One two punch of sucking the wind right out of their sails before handing them an oar to row if they want to move that ship so damn bad.

            • kitnaht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              The problem with paid account creation is it literally links your real-world identity to your online identity. That’s the WHOLE purpose of it for Microsoft, they want to know who you are. Don’t even start with crypto either, it’s not anonymous.

              • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                29 days ago

                See that’s the thing, if your real world identity becomes linked to the account, then creating ban evasion accounts means literally having to get a new identity. Again, we see more layers of effort that have to be crossed for the intention of being able to harass someone who blocked you.

                The point isn’t to be perfect, it’s to make breaching so annoyingly time and resource consuming that all but state actors who are REALLY determined will bounce off and just go do something else with their time.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            I just found out that my boss does this shit. He’s got 3 facebook identities so when he’s losing an argument, he jumps on “Richard” or “David” to dogpile the conversation and make it look like more people agree with him on internet arguments.

            Those alt accounts are known as sock puppets.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        On reddit, blocking people was pretty useless long-term. It did get the more aggressive assholes to leave you alone, at least, but there are SO MANY awful people on that site that trying to block them all is like trying to stop a tidal wave with your hand.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Spend enough time in the comments and you’ll notice a handful of “usual suspects” sticking out. So I’ll usually look at their profiles to see their history. If a pattern emerges, block them.

        They’re usually ones that immediately jump to extremes, make bad faith comparisons right off the bat, or otherwise Godwin’s Law a comment thread between 0 and 1 replies in.

        • MBM@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          If it’s really only that few people I wish the mods/admins were just slightly more ban-happy

        • Toldry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Genuine question: Is there a part of you that fears that by blocking dissenting voices, you may be reinforcing your filter bubble?

          • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            There’s dissent and then there’s concern trolling and preventing meaningful discourse. So no. I don’t block people who disagree with me. Just those who refuse to let others have meaningful discussion by jumping into every comment thread and derailing the conversation.

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      The real politics of this is that nothing will happen unless the US allows it. And so far the US have only allowed continued violence.

      There’s too many voters in the US that believe their sky god is the sky god that should rule those lands.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        this. providing arms and the empire’s backing to israel is what enables them to bully the entire region.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      It honestly astonishes me that even only the christians in that city are so at each other’s throats that they can’t even agree to move a fucking ladder, can only imagine how big the grudges are between faiths.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    i feel you but i think conservatives are the ones who need to hear this

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    Why are we still using BBL Drizzy in memes?

    Everytime I see him now I just hear that song in my head lol

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    i like this post, this is a good post.

    Rule of thumb for anybody picking up politics. If you’re picking sides you’ve already fucked up.

    there are no sides, merely degrees of varying and dynamic inaccuracy.

  • VeryImportantUser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    This is just thinly veiled anti Israel propaganda. One side bombs innocent children, the other is trying to hide and flee.

    • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’m all for the Palestinian people getting their freedom and lives back and stopping the Israeli government dead in its tracks if not replacing it, but I’m not going to pretend that Hamas is innocent. Just because the Palestinians are victims of the worst crime of this century, doesn’t mean the governing body that rules over them with an iron fist is good.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      Eh? You know all Hamas has been doing for the past decade is yeeting unguided missiles at Israel. Sometimes they land in Gaza and kill Palestinians, most of them get intercepted, occasionally one makes it through and lands on a random building. That is the definition of an indiscriminate terrorist attack. It serves no military purpose whatsoever. If Hamas had the firepower they would kill every last Jewish person in Israel.

        • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Lol that’s a take for sure. Funny that this is on a post about trying to have nuanced discussion. I guess calling Hamas a terrorist group makes me a zionist, since if Isreal is bad Hamas must actually be good.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Obviously the sides aren’t equivalent, but it’s true that not all Jews support Israel and that pro-Palestinian activists aren’t generally antisemitic.