I found out that xubuntu spams users including me, which to me is a no go.

I’m looking for a linux based ad free distro that lets me work with libreoffice, vlc, tbb, transmission, okular, pdfarranger, hexchat, gimp and ocr.

I’m going to use it to edit text, watch movies, download multimedia, chat and edit audio with audacity.

it’s not going to be a server and I’d like to work with the terminal as much as possible. At the same time, I’m a newbie.

  • mikyopii@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Just use Debian. Why use the inferior downstream distros when you can go right to the OG? You are already halfway there.

    Debian doesn’t have a corporate sponsor so there is no risk of getting spammed or giving someone your personal information.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They do have corporate sponsors. It just that the corporate sponsors do not want to see ads anymore than you do. They are have strong community leadership that is powered equally.

  • Schwim Dandy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can I ask what you consider “spamming ads” to be? That could be relevant to suggesting alternatives.

      • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        according to the github readme, you can just run sudo pro config set apt_news=false to disable those

        if you have things set up the way you like on xubuntu, it’s maybe worth it to just do that rather than start fresh

        • nzeayn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          thats just a short term fixes too though. the ads will get more intrusive and annoying. and at some point pro ads will just turning themselves back on. because this is a company and it wants to sell things.

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Afaik you will get this message because you use Ubuntu LTS. Which ships outdated, “stable” packages.

        The solution is not just silencing that message and continuing to use them, but some way to get updates OR security backports for them.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Who needs stable anyway. We all should just use Arch. (Not an excuse Ubuntu showing ads)

          Edit: this is a joke

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Stable means randomly cut off package updates.

            Continuous testing and integration is the best way for normal usage. With the iterations “bleeding edge” “fresh” “slightly tested” and “tested”

              • ulkesh@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                So if one wanted to run Arch but were of a similar opinion to you, then they could run Manjaro, which is also a semi-rolling release distro. It’s just on the monthly cadence.

                Everyone has their opinions on distros. Doesn’t mean any one opinion is wrong.

              • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yes but Fedora is semi-rolling, something in the middle. This is about Ubuntu LTS, a traditional LTS version that cuts off packages on some random version.

                This should really only be done if

                1. The programs have a supported LTS/ESR version (Linux Kernel, Firefox, Thunderbird…) (btw GNOME, Chromium etc. dont have one)
                2. The packagers have a lot of time, the users pay money and the packagers actually make those versions as bug free and secure as possible, while keeping the feature freeze

                Ubuntu is trying to do 2. but have this separation in there to get money.

                • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I would use Debian way before I would use Ubuntu. If 3 years of support isn’t enough I would use something RHEL

  • yala@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Btw, OP, I foresee a switch to Linux Mint Xfce Edition. Please consider writing about your experiences in which you compare Xubuntu to Linux Mint Xfce Edition. Thanks in advance!

  • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Any distro can do what you need. Others have suggested Pop, Mint, Debian, Endeavour, and more. I’d agree with basically all of them. Really it comes down to what you prefer most.

    Personally I’d lean more toward Debian as it’s a basic distro with very little extra bloat, loads of documentation, incredibly stable, etc. I always prefer a spartan, basic system I can add pieces to as I please, rather than a bunch of preloaded defaults that may or may not be to my taste. Again though, that’s just me.

    Endeavour is great, but if you aren’t used to Arch, and how to maintain it, things can get sort of messy after a while (definitely need to make a good habbit of cleaning your package managers cache, as well as read up on what’s called a “pacdiff”. In general, Arch and its derivatives require research). It’s worth trying if you’re interested in rolling distros though.

    Another might be OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. From what I hear, it’s a bit more stable and curated than Arch so it may be a better option if you’re inexperience with a rolling release. I’ve never personally tried it, but have heard lots of good things from causal and power users alike.

  • nzeayn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m in the same spot and 95% settled on moving to debian.

    xubuntu has been good to me the last 10yrs. But its been about xfce, ubuntu got be part of the relationship because it was easy when i knew very little about linux. that and it can run well on a potato with a bunch of computer parts just duct taped randomly onto it. which is basically what my dumpster dived laptop was 10 yes ago.

  • LoveSausage@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    PeppermintOS everything you need and nothing you don’t. Debian based with extra on top. Runs on 2gb ram , fast. Click install and setup but all the terminal stuff you want.since everyone mentions mint , it was a while since I used it. Felt bloated , perhaps better now. I stil say peppermint even for someone coming directly from Windows

  • f00f/eris@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Any software that is in the Xubuntu repositories will also be available in other Ubuntu derivatives, and most likely Debian and all its derivatives as well. Only the official spins are likely to advertise Ubuntu Pro.

    Mint XFCE is a good replacement, but I’m also partial to KDE Neon, which keeps preinstalled software to a minimum and is by far the most performant KDE distro I have tried. I myself use regular Debian, with KDE, though you can choose XFCE during the install.