• stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    It doesn’t say anything about 18th century human rights philosophers either but it’s full of that too.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes. It is. It’s assumed because that’s how the legal theories at the time it was written went.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s clear that you think that it was written in a vacuum without any historical context. That’s not how history works. It’s unclear why you are stuck on this particular hill.

                • blazera@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Oh ive learned plenty. That the constitution has nothing in it to support common law.