• apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    A pediatric doctor at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia was killed while riding her bike in Center City on Wednesday night.

    The use of passive voice in the first sentence does a lot of work shifting blame away from the driver and the car centric systems in an “objective” effort.

    How about:

    Cyclist Barbara Friedes died when the driver of a car hit her in the bike lane on Wednesday night.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Yep, high school grammar 101. It isn’t that journalists don’t know this, it is how they are trained. Shift obvious blame away from parties for objectivity until a verdict or deference to the status quo.

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, we all agree on that fact. The discussion progressed to two different commentors’ active voice re-writes of the original sentence.

        • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:@towns.gay
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          @apfelwoiSchoppen But functionally, the victim didn’t die on her own, she died as the direct result of the driver hitting her. For the purpose of accurately portraying who took an action and who was acted upon, it should emphasize the driving, not the dying.

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The discussion was active voice vs passive voice, not functionality of active voice vs functionality of differently-worded active voice. They’re both still active voice.

            • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:@towns.gay
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              @PapaStevesy IMO active voice includes focusing the sentence on the subject that did the action, not the one that was acted upon but by all means let’s argue about grammatical definitions instead of the problem of motorists killing people and journalists normalizing it. 🙄

              • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I mean, you’re literally the one who started the argument, being dismissive and condescending about it now just makes you look like a sore loser.

              • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                You’re the one doing that. Killed/died same difference, but I apologize for not using the same verb as the original quote for clarity.

    • Bademantel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      Very interesting, thank you. I was wondering if that also happens in other countries. It is sadly the norm in Germany when reporting car accidents.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Somebody told me that at her hospital they don’t say “accident” since it’s always preventable. They say “collision”

            • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              The army shifted to this verbiage as well from “accidental discharge” to “negligent discharge” when at the clearing barrels or while on patrol.

              Also increased the punishment, and it helped quite a bit in reducing the knuckleheads. No longer a “whoops! Mah bad”

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I suspect the tone is used so they aren’t sued for stuff. I understand it but I disagree on their usage of it.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      While I agree with the car centric aspect of this, you should read the article. The top bullets are more specific, and the driver may have had a medical incident.

      • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Thanks, I did. Then I wrote the comment, copied the quote directly from the article. It is the first sentence of the article. I also said the cyclist died, made no indication that the person was “murdered” or anything.

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s a because there is no speculation that she was murdered. If the driver had a stroke, or some other medical incident, it would not be murder.