• Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    So apparently they had a bit asking players to not share info about the game, but you could technically back out of it without agreeing so legally they can post whatever they want. It feels like a case of “this is legal to do but maybe kinda shitty and valve might be upset”. Basically the agreement was informal and not enforceable and the verge just said fuck it. They did get banned afterwards, but I think that and not working with them in the future is all valve can do.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      If 10,000 people are doing something, it is NOT secret, and journalists must report on it for the general benefit of society.

      Valve has their head in the clouds if they thought they could keep an informal secret among the population of a small town.

      • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This isn’t some grand conspiracy it’s a closed beta for a video game. It’s pretty normal to have an NDA or embargo agreement to get access. It sounds like valve just goofed the implementation. So yeah it’s totally legal for them to post it, valve just might avoid giving them early copies in the future.

        • RangerJosie@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          Totally. Verge just lost their access to breaking gaming news. They’ll be blacklisted from now on.

          That said, I don’t know anyone who goes to The Verge for breaking news on gaming.

        • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          There is no NDA for Deadlock, and anyone in it can invite anyone they want, as often as they want. It’s not like Valve has no idea how to privately test their game. I think they made these decisions deliberately.

          • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            A bit of the eula says not to share info about the game, but you can literally back out without accepting the eula, and still play. So I don’t know if I’d call it intentional, but there’s definitely no legal reason they can’t post whatever they want. They just got banned for it and might have damaged their relationship with valve somewhat. Depends on how much valve cares tho.