• mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sad, from a nostalgia point of view, but probably a win, environmentally. We have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles, the mylar pouches are pretty much all single use.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Bottle deposit systems are generally effective. In Sweden, 90-95% of the pet plastic in drink bottles makes it back to a factory to be used as raw material for new bottles. We don’t really recycle the hdpe lids or polyester labels, though.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Our school won’t let us send reusable glass containers excuse of fear of breakage.

          I kinda understand, but our first grader has been using them for snacks at home for 5 years and never broken one.

        • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s not actually a solution when talking single-use either. Remaking the bottles from recycled glass is incredibly energy intensive and not an environmentally friendly process either. Multi-use bottles are much better, but the cleaning required also isn’t that simple and also relatively energy intensive (far from remaking the bottles of course).

          There’s also practical downsides to glass (heavy, breakable), but those are subjective and their relevance highly depends on the use case.

          Ideally, we wouldn’t buy stuff to drink in any kind of bottle, but just use tap water. possibly just buy some concentrated stuff to then make your actual drink at home. Nothing beats the effectiveness of transporting water through a simple pipe, but that isn’t even possible everywhere in the world due to drinking water quality issues…

            • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Good job with reading you did there. Your didn’t even make it 8 words in and already decided to comment. Maybe give it another go, if you dare, and try getting a little further this time.

        • chingadera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well that would be because the god-king CEO would have like 45k less per year out of his 38,000,000 dollar salary without bonuses and stock value if we were to do that, you fuckin peasant idiot chump. Not only that but their enabling middle management might have as much as $200 less in their annual bonuses. Think for someone else other than yourself for once.