• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not really. The only word in that whole tweet which is technically incorrect is “already”

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The moon doesn’t produce light, it is reflecting sunlight, so in my opinion the first statement is incorrect

        • bisby@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          But if the moon wasn’t there, there would be no light reflected. Doesn’t matter the source, we have light at night because of the moon

            • bisby@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I would hope the whole thing is a joke in general.

              “The sun gives us light when it’s ‘already’ bright” is where the real logic breaks down. “I don’t need <thing> because I already have <benefit from thing>” is circular logic.

              So of course we wouldn’t have sunlight at night without the sun. but we also wouldn’t have sunlight at night without the moon.

              Whether we want to call it “more useful” than the sun… it is just as useful as the sun at night. We need both of them for the system to work. I was just trying to snarkily emphasize that we shouldn’t downplay the moon because it is “just” reflecting sunlight.