• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Furries by nature are either attracted to animal aesthetics or think they are one.

    That is not healthy, accept it.

    • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      That is again not even close to a correct definition, and it is interesting that you think yourself the best person to judge something that you don’t know the first thing about.

        • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Giving up when facing any opposition seems like you never really intended on improving your worldview. You just want to be hateful of things that you don’t understand. The irony of you thinking that those who oppose the LGBT are any different is not lost on me. It’s easy to punch down on things that you don’t personally like, but those are real people that you’re targeting with your malice. I’m not a furry, but I am gay, and as an LGBT member yourself you should understand the power of being an ally to a minority that often gets painted in a bad light. Doubly so when ~80% of furries are LGBTQIA+ in the first place; it’s an LGBT subculture.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re not opposing me, you’re just advocating for some fucked up shit that the world would be a better place for if people got help.

            I’m sorry but just the same as any other harmful attraction, I cannot condone this one either.

            • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It is repeatedly hilarious that you pretend that these arguments are any different than the ones homophobes are using. What is the harm, exactly?

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                In attraction to animals? That should be self explanatory.

                In delusional fantasies? Rejection of basics of reality.

                • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You keep using the word “animal”, but anthropomorphic cartoons are not real animals. Attraction to real animals is not what being a furry is. (You already know this, you are using the term in a loaded way in order to say one thing but mean another) (this unfortunately does not convince anyone).

                  There’s nothing inherent to being a furry that demands a “delusional fantasy” (you would know this if you knew what furries are). You call yourself Deceptichum and have a transformers avatar - you may be at risk of being in a “delusional fantasy” if that’s how you want to classify the people with anonymous names and furry avatars!

                  So where is the part where the “world is a worse place” because of furries?