• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        18 days ago

        It depends. Defederation for good reasons is good, defederation for bad or false reasons is generally bad.

        As an example, having a strict and democratic defederation/federation policy has contributed to Hexbear having the most active trans community on Lemmy, and it’s a good thing that there’s an actively protected trans space free from bigotry.

        At the same time, defederating from instances for political reasons under the guise of other reasons is generally a bad thing.

        It’s largely context dependent.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          I mean, “bad” in this case is completely subjective. There are large trans communities on other instances (blahaj being the most obvious one) and they have their reasons for defederating from Hexbear.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Hexbear defederated from blahaj, not the other way around. Either way, Hexbear remains the most active trans community on Lemmy.

            I understand why anticommunist instances like Lemmy.world defederate from Hexbear, I just don’t think it will help Lemmy.world in the long run, as Lemmy itself by nature is going to attract Communists due to its structure.

            • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              I dunno, I feel like anyone drawn to Lemmy for that reason will find lemmy.ml nearly as easily. If world suffers because of bad practices, well, that’s the way it goes. At least the fediverse lives on.

            • Pandantic [none/username]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              Honestly .world should have just blocked the most common shiposting Hexbear comms like chapotraphouse and dunk_tank as these are what most users found annoying. And I believe ther are more leftists on .world than one might think. There’s a great games comm on Hexbear too, and downvote away on the leftist game posts - Hexbear doesn’t have downvotes anyway!

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                The problem is that Lemmy.world doesn’t want Communists using their communities, not that their users shouldn’t be exposed to Communist posts, because they wanted homogenous liberalism.

                There are some leftists on .world, but they usually leave in favor of leftist instances from what I have personally seen.

                Absolutely agree about Hexbear’s games comm, easily the best gaming comm on Lemmy.

      • Ion@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Well that’s definitely your own experience on federated platforms, but I wasn’t speaking to that circumstance. I made a mastodon account and criticized our government’s massive funding of Israel in spite of our lack of critical infrastructure and healthcare and got spammed with “Israel has a right to defend itself, and you 're a trumper if you think otherwise” type comments by people that post one response and then immediately block you. Which is laughable and couldn’t be further from the truth. That is the perpetual echo chamber I was referring to from my personal experience.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Are positive, liberal LGBT communities echo chambers

        Could be, especially if there aren’t a multitude of sentiments there. That doesn’t mean all sentiments must be present of course.

        Are they not allowed a collective space to hang out without having to explain themselves all the time

        I don’t think anyone said they aren’t allowed to have such a space.

      • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        18 days ago

        You’re in an echo chamber if you curate your home feed to only show one opinion and then never change it; it doesn’t matter what the opinion is

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      It’s ironically more about certain instances creating echo chambers through constant censorship.

      Imagine an instance full of Nazi’s that only ever let’s Nazi posts stick. Is this if any value, or would defederating improve the quality of your experience?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah part of the point of this is that it’s not a free speech zone unless you want a free speech instance. I prefer a more curated against bigots experience. Others don’t. Still others prefer other forms of curation. Federation means we can all talk to each other as long as we stay within boundaries of what others will stay federated with.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    18 days ago

    I think it depends on what you disagree with. If one is promoting going after our neighbors, hunting them down and killing them? Yeah, defederate. If another is Meta trying to take over the federation. Yeah, I vote defederate. If one thinks Hawaiian pizza is a travesty and the other doesn’t, hold your horses.

  • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    free speech also applies to lemmy servers. If the server doesn’t agree with most of what’s on your server, they can and should have the option to not associate with your server at all. This honestly sounds like a shit take elon would have made.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Some places suck.

    Some places suck, by design.

    Reducing criticism of systemic problems to “just because you disagree” is dishonest… and indicative.

      • joyhunter@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        sigh All because of woke! It’s like you can’t even be civilized and manifest destiny in peace anymore… sarcasm

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        18 days ago

        I see no problem with blocking users for their belief that I should be slaughtered over the sin of checks comments being born in the USA.

        And I see no problem blocking instances where they gather.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          You do realize that was most likely a joke comment, right? The genocidal US Empire is awful, but the idea that some online Communist thinks you should die purely from being from the US is silly.

        • abcdefg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          Buddy your country has killed tens if not over a hundred million people in the conquest of war for hegemonic power and resource control across the globe. Someone on the internet hurt your feelings when making a joke. Obviously those two things are the same. 🙄

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      It is kinda surprising how much obvious propaganda makes it onto Lemmy, for example those memes that aren’t really memes as much as “haha this opinion wrong”

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        This is a very political place, even compared to Reddit where there’s a shitload of politics

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          I think it’s just as much a hivemind if not moreso than Reddit. Also, probably way easier to make bots for too

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    When Musk took over Twitter he allowed violent and extremist views to flood it without moderation.

    That’s the sort of community Lemmy would be if we didn’t have the tools needed to keep it clean of harmful ideologies.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        When nazis start enforcing their ideology I will raise arms, until then your sentiment closely resembles the goal of propagandists on these sites: create division and cause violence.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 days ago

          What are you talking about? Exploding Heads is a literal Nazi Lemmy Instance that was defederated by pretty much every major instance.

          Or are you going on an Anticommunist rant?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            I have no context about the community, I assumed you were advocating for exploding heads of political enemies as a way of keeping feeds clean, because the comment explicitly reads as such.

            There is nothing communist about Nazis, just like theres nothing Democratic about the DPRK.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 days ago

              I have no context about the community, I assumed you were advocating for exploding heads of political enemies as a way of keeping feeds clean, because their comment explicitly reads as such.

              That’s certainly a leap. Exploding Heads is a Nazi Lemmy Instance.

              There is nothing communist about Nazis, just like theres nothing Democratic about the DPRK.

              So it was a random anticommunist rant, unprovoked, lmao

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                If anything I said seems anticommunist to you then clearly you don’t know what communism is.

                You should start referring to the nazi community “exploding heads” as “the nazi community “exploding heads”” if you dont want people to think of heads which are exploding.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          Anti-Trade

          What does this mean?

          Anti-NATO

          It’s good to be Anti-NATO, NATO has Nazi origins and serves as a way to maintain Western Hegemony, securing profits via Imperialism and defending said Imperialism through coalition.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 days ago

            Lmao

            Mutual defense and deterrent to invasion by hostile world powers both in and outside of NATO is a bad thing? Sure, okay pal.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              17 days ago

              .

              Also, don’t send us reports just because you don’t agree with someone. We’re not here to censor people for you.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 days ago

                Oh no! So you want to talk about how the mutual self defence pact is somehow oppressing you or will you just keep dodging forever?

                • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 days ago

                  Reason: User threatens me not to report his alt accounts for misinformation again

                  What alt accounts? What are you even talking about? That’s two bullshit reports in one day, wasting our time.

                  Reason: Claimes NATO forces other nations into subservience.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 days ago

              It’s an alliance between Imperialist countries, and the alliance itself has Nazi origins and has had Nazi leaders. Yes, it’s a bad thing, because Imperialism is a bad thing.

              It’s a gang of countries that hyper-exploit the Global South in mutual defense against said Global South.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                It’s literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

                Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  It’s literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

                  It’s expansionist against the wishes of outside countries, and NATO exerts military pressure on the Global South.

                  Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

                  Bzzzzt wrong. NATO’s only function is to preserve Western Hegemony and dominate the Global South militarily, so that member-States can continue exploiting ruthlessly unopposed. This results in proxy wars, such as the Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

        • graphene@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Ah yes, free trade, the thing that improved the economies of ex-communist countries after the USSRs collapse and is on the path to fixing almost every African nations poverty.

          Ah yes, NATO, the “we will only call for (and maybe possibly do something to enforce) human rights if it’s convenient for us” alliance. And I’m sure all it’s member nations have squeaky clean track records when it comes to international politics.

          We must ban anyone against these things! That’s dangerous extremist ideology

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            NATO’s only function is mutual defense, NATO support ends when a member attacks.

            Since the only thing NATO does is prevent War, the only anti-NATO stance is a pro-war stance.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 days ago

                Are you referring to the coalition of some NATO members and some non-NATO members (19 nations total) enforcing a United Nations Security Council decision to make an immediate ceasefire and end the civil war in Libya?

                The one with zero troops on the ground?

                Being in NATO had no impact on the events, NATO member support was not mandatory as per the terms of NATO. The only reason they even call it a NATO operarion was because Itally would only vote in favor of the operation if NATO members were in charge instead of France.

                • IAmNotACat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  The reason for NATO’s involvement is quite irrelevant because they were still happy to step in and do the work. The fact is that it was ultimately NATO-led and their efforts did not lead to peace in the region.

                  To call NATO’s involvement in Libya ‘anti-war’ is sheer lunacy.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          I’ve got bad news for you: a lot of us are anti-NATO.

          Also, what the hell is anti-trade? Do you want every Westphalian state to build a wall around itself?

          Edit to add: Oh I see, you created this new account because @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today got permabanned from lemmy.ml 😂 Let’s see how long this one lasts…

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Have yet to personally block any instances. So far I think the closest I’ve come is blocking a spider community because fuck those hell spawns and a Minecraft community or two.

    Edit:

    Found out there’s more than I remember being blocked. Multiple mc communities, a cock community (, because that stuff ain’t for me and I remember accidentally clicking on one post from there by accident), a pussy community because I don’t come here for porn, a Sintendo community, some bikinibottomtwitter or something similarly named community (you can guess why), and for some reason an xbox community (couldn’t tell you why).

    Also, I noticed for some reason I have someone from a different instance that I cannot remember why I blocked. Some guy from lemmt(dot)tf, so I have absolutely no clue since I have no idea what that instance is like, let alone remember anything about that account.

  • Funkwonker@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Defederation is weak sauce. Just block/tag accounts that aren’t willing to engage in good faith, and your page clears up pretty quickly.

    At the end of the day, there aren’t even that many people stirring the pot. They’re just unhealthily active.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    In aggregate; 5 instances, less than 5 communities, and more than 69, nice, blocked users.

    I don’t mess around. I don’t hesitate to block people who argue needlessly, make my experience less informational or less entertaining, troll, or disregard arguments made in foundational logic to push a point of view or ‘win the argument’. Similarly my instance ignores downvotes and does not display them; as with most platforms which behave similarly to reddit; they simply do not work outside of your personal, local account, local instance, user-sorting context.