• BackwoodsBeatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You basically said what I was going to, but the ideal world part I disagree with.

    A world in which enough is grown to feed everyone and enough profit is produced to meet everyone’s needs doesn’t need to be ideal. It’s a world we live in now.

    The above dude should just stick to attacking the ultra wealthy and like you said, not space programs.

    But like I was saying, an ideal world isn’t needed. Just about 30% of the rest of us to physically and verbally confront the few thousand or so who take too much.

    • fearout@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok, ideal is probably the wrong word here. What I meant is a world where narrowly focused efforts are actually fast and effective, it might be a good idea to heavily prioritise some stuff to deal with pressing misery-inducing issues faster. But as we currently are, that concept just isn’t rooted in reality.